Pursuant to Section 125 of Act No. 100/1970 final decisions under this Act can be quashed, at the request of the policeman concerned, if important new facts are established

        On 19 October 1992, in the course of the internal police enquiry one policeman who had arrested the applicant and five other policemen who had questioned him either

noziedzības apkarošanas birojs ) of the State Police with a view to reporting that police officers of the 7th section of the Economic Police of the Rīga City Police Department ( Rīgas pilsētas Galvenās policijas

He is a Garda (policeman).   Summary of the facts   The applicant was allegedly assaulted by a British soldier in the Republic of Ireland.

  Mr von Bülow was convicted in 1975 for the murder of a policeman and attempted murder of two other policemen following an incident in the early hours of 6 July 1974 when, on being stopped by the

On 12 July 2013 the applicant, a policeman at a border crossing post, was detained together with thirty-one other individuals.

Pressure to sell, repeated calls, undercover policeman, lack of incriminating information.

    In June 2009 the applicant, a former policeman, was committed to the Kapotnya detention centre ( Следственный изолятор № 7 Капотня ) on bribery charges. 5.

    The events of 20 September 2003 and the following investigation On 20 September 2003 the applicant was apparently again beaten in his remand prison cell by a policeman for refusal to sign

condition following his arrest and police custody had been the result of him falling to the ground and being kicked by mistake a few times by members of the crowd that gathered round and tried to kick the policeman

    The text of the confession was dictated to the applicant by the policeman Mr N., who in process repeatedly hit the applicant on the head with a rubber truncheon. 7.

POLIZZILa greffière, S.

When he entered the station a policeman pushed him and pointed a gun to his head.

According to the record of the hearing, he remained outside the courtroom in the presence of a   court guard and a policeman while the applicants and their lawyers were in the courtroom.

A claim for compensation against the authorities for the trauma allegedly caused by the police’s investigative methods is still pending.

       The applicants instituted proceedings before the First Instance Multi-Member Civil Court (Polimeles Protodikio) of Athens.

It considered that the police’s forceful intervention had been disproportionate and had not been necessary for the prevention of disorder, in violation of Article   11.

In particular, have the applicants exhausted domestic remedies, given that their complaints concerning the police’s failure to take measures and the criminal investigations concerning violence against

Prior to the District Court’s order, the police’s suspicion against the suspects had been confirmed, in particular, by information obtained via telephone tapping and police surveillance of the suspects

The criminal case against the applicant had been brought essentially with the purpose of covering up the police’s responsibility for the ill-treatment.