He emphasised that his torture at the UBOZ premises had been the most essential element of his complaint and that his allegations in this respect had remained unanswered.

– which occurred without proper consideration of the fact that his appeal hearing was still pending – or the subsequent rejection of his appeal owing to his involuntary absence. 42.

As to his indemnification claim brought under Ss. 383-385/A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, he submits that it would be adjudicated no sooner than in two years which renders this remedy ineffective

In his submission, his rights to liberty, to be heard in court and to be informed promptly by a judge of the reasons for his detention on remand as well as his rights to be heard within a reasonable time

his detention was justified and, if need be, to request a judge to examine the justification for his detention.

As for his complaint concerning the fear of death penalty, the Court observes that since October 1984 the Turkish National Assembly did not render any decision authorising the enforcement of a death penalty

He was asked the whereabouts of his son. He said that his son had gone to Diyarbakir to work, following his military service. The police told him that Muhsin had been apprehended after a clash.

It further considered that the applicant was re-attempting to have a third-instance finding on his case, and that his claim was frivolous. 4.

Un nouveau routing a été demandé hier. Les perspectives d'éloignement sont toujours aussi certaines.

    In his written submissions to the High Court, the applicant reiterated his arguments in connection with the amounts received from his father and his wife.

his colleagues.

His job as a liquidator had constituted his only source of income and he and his family had thus suffered a grave and unexpected loss of earnings following the revocation of his licence. 11 .

made as a result of his ill-treatment in securing his conviction had rendered his trial unfair. 4.

He held the submachine gun in front of his chest and pointed it at [Officer M.] who had also pointed his submachine gun at him and told him to drop his weapon ...

were dependent on his   confessing his guilt.

According to this report the applicant’s son had burns to 90% of his body.

        On 28 April 1993 the applicant requested the District Administrative Authority to render a declaratory decision that his removal to Jugoslavia, Macedonia, Italy, Croatia

It considered that the behaviour that had triggered his recall to prison did not increase his risk of sexual offending and that the circumstances of recall were likely to have increased his understanding

In the applicant’s opinion, the judge only justified the unlawful period of his remand in custody and did not properly order his detention.

The data held included information such his name, address, date of birth and presence at demonstrations.