The first-instance and appellate courts refused to make the referral and the Constitutional Court, sitting as a final court of appeal, dismissed the applicant companies’ amparo appeal, despite having declared

:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 31396/09 by Jörn IPSEN against Germany The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting

inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 55662/13 Bela TOTHPAL against Romania The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting

{ width:138.09pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 7738/15 Vladimir GRIBINCIA against Romania   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting

s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 14968/16 Mihai COCUZ against Romania   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting

{ width:138.09pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 59176/15 Raul-Emanuel NEMA against Romania   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting

sE6546C2D { width:159.78pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 36001/15 Sorin Ionuț ARICIU against Romania The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting

s67CC2216 { width:138.53pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 17848/16 Cătălin SAVU against Romania   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting

s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 16278/21 ZAO REDAKTSYYA ‘NEZAVISIMOY GAZETY’ against Russia The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting

s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 46720/16 Sergiu MARIAN against Romania   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting

inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 38589/23 Dawoud QUASIMI against Denmark The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting

In particular, he installed a toilet sink and pretended to use it by pulling down his pants and sitting on it.

Relying on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the applicant complained that judge C.G.T. sitting on the appeal panel dealing with his case had not been impartial.

display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 6015/08 TPTK KERAMIST against Ukraine The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting

{ width:138.09pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 38427/16 Rommel-Dan VOICU against Romania   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting

inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 15075/22 Sándor ALANYAI against Hungary The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting

display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 8024/09 by PP GIR I K against Ukraine The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting

Relying on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the applicant complained that judge I.N.C. sitting on the appeal panel dealing with his case had not been impartial.

168.28pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 15623/16 Mihai-Gabriel SELIN against Romania The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting