On 22 January 2012 the applicant lodged an interlocutory appeal against the decision imposing the custodial penalty.

The decision was served on the applicant on 30   December 2013.

    By an interlocutory judgment of 23 February 2010 the Court of Cassation noted that although he had been lawfully summoned, the applicant had failed to attend the hearing.

    The decision of the Regional Court of 26 September 2011 was served on the applicant on 25 October 2011. 4.     Written grounds of the applicant’s interlocutory appeal 16.

    The applicant lodged an interlocutory appeal against the deputy disciplinary officer’s decision to hear him as a witness.

decision.

.) - 32602/96 Decision 25.1.2000 [Section I] Article 6 Article 6-2 Presumption of innocence Refusal of compensation, following the discontinuation of criminal proceedings against a company, for damage

The domestic courts have broadly followed this leading decision.

In a decision dated 1 February 2006 the Court of Appeal, in interlocutory proceedings, dismissed the applicant’s appeal of 6 September 2005 against the Regional Court’s decision of 15 July 2005 concerning

    Between October 1998 and April 1999 the applicant association requested the court on four occasions to issue a decision on its request for an interlocutory measure. 10.

The interested party has five days from the notification of the interlocutory judgment to apply for a review of the court’s decision if the application for legal aid was dismissed. 3.

No other decisive steps were taken that day.

A l'issue du recours hiérarchique du 24 novembre 2020 et de l'interlocution départementale qui s'est déroulée le 2 novembre 2021, le service vérificateur a maintenu les rectifications.

The applicant lodged an interlocutory appeal against that decision. 12.

On 27 May 2014 the Oldenburg High Court dismissed an interlocutory appeal by S.S. against that decision.

The applicant appealed against the decision and requested to be released under judicial supervision.

2018 a été présenté dans le délai de recours de trente jours prévu à l'article R. 57-1 du livre des procédures fiscales suivant la réponse aux observations du contribuable qui est intervenue par deux décisions

        On 25 May 1987, in a further interlocutory judgment, the Court of Appeal decided that the applicant should carry out service activities (dienstverlenende werkzaamheden

Elle ajouta que cette décision avait été prise abstraction faite du fond de l’affaire.