Ukraine , nos. 15367/14 and 13 others, §§ 9-17, 21 January 2021).

  12686/03, § 37, 20 March 2009; Ştefănică and Others v.   Romania , no.   38155/02, §§ 37-38, 2 November 2010; Atanasovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia , no.

In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised.

  Romania , no. 24093/14 and 16 others, §§ 17-23, 23 February 2016; Ecaterina Mirea and Others v. Romania , no. 43626/13 and 69 others, §§   16-20, 12 April 2016; and Mocanu and Others v.

In the case of Kuznetsov and Others v.

  1 and that the status of prisoner was covered by the term “other status” in Article   14. Article   14 was thus applicable.

  2430/06 and 3 others, § 42, 31 May 2016, and Igranov and Others   v.   Russia , nos. 42399/13 and 8 others, § 35, 20   March 2018). 24.

on 7 January 2026 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the impossibility to register in Lithuania the applicants as a same-sex couple, either through marriage, civil partnership or any other

authorities, Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v.

; Loredana Orășanu and Others v.

In the case of Kirilyuk and Others v.

Russia, nos. 25501/07 and 4 others, 26 April 2016 and Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, 7   February 2017).

In the case of Alisoy and Others v.

and others 11 November 2004 4927/05 LOIZOU & KTORI 22 November 2004 4931/05 ZACHARIADES GEORGIOU and others 15 November 2004 4936/05 COSTI and others 18 November 2004 4947/05 TZIORTZI and others 22

In the case of Loginov and Others v.

In the case of Bazhenov and Others v.

In the case of Zaytsev and Others v.

AND FREHA 20/10/2016 20/10/2016 66534/11 SOLTÉSZ AND OTHERS 11/01/2018 11/01/2018 72595/13 PÁZSI AND OTHERS 15/11/2018 15/11/2018 67794/13 GÉCZI AND OTHERS 15/11/2018 15/11/2018 72114/13 CZEBE AND OTHERS

ÁGUA, S.A. 15/12/2009 15/03/2010 41954/05+ SAMPAIO DE LEMOS AND 22 OTHER “AGRARIAN REFORM” CASES 15/12/2009 28/06/2010 1408/06 VILHENA PERES SANTOS LANCA THEMUDO E MELO AND OTHERS 15/12/2009 15/03/2010

The Court stated in this connection:   “This Court cannot agree that it is irrelevant that [the applicant and the other independent candidate] were charged with other crimes.