CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Pôle 6 - Chambre 3
60320883e69107406471029c
15 mai 2018
par Me Aline PRONIER, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES, toque : 550 INTIMEE SARL CLINALLIANCE PARIS BUTTES CHAUMONT [Adresse 2] [Adresse 2] N° SIRET : 441 637 402 représentée par Me Claire SELLERIN-CLABASSI
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0910DEC001254318
10 septembre 2024
They submitted seventeen decisions of the domestic commercial courts, rendered in 2012 and 2013, in which the final decisions of commercial courts on the opening and closing of bankruptcy proceedings were
6ème Chambre
DTA_2202397_20231219
19 décembre 2023
qu'elle était inapte à ses fonctions ; - si elle a été hospitalisée en juillet 2009, dans le service de neurochirurgie du centre hospitalier de Mulhouse pour la prise en charge d'un infarctus cérébral selvien
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-110566
20 février 2012
He describes the conditions of his detention in Jilava Prison as follows: general overcrowding, the applicant having shared a twenty sq. m cell with seventeen to eighteen inmates; poor hygiene that is
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0328JUD004120398
28 mars 2000
;     JUDGMENT     STRASBOURG   28 March 2000     This judgment is subject to editorial revision before its reproduction in final form in the official reports of selected
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2289
29 janvier 2008
The applicant had been selected for detention on the basis that his case was suited for fast-track processing. The national authorities had thus acted in good faith in detaining the applicant.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0407DEC002586107
7 avril 2009
On 5 June 2006 the Thessaloniki Assize Court sentenced him to seventeen years' imprisonment and to a fine of 17,000   euros (decision no.   824/2006).
ECLI:CEDH:002-9896
29 octobre 1992
Conclusion : Ireland to pay Dublin Well Woman specified sum in respect of damage (seventeen votes to six) and to Dublin Well Woman and Open Door for costs (unanimously).
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2899247-3189363
20 octobre 2009
  At the same time, the Court noted that the suspensions of the publications had not been imposed only on selected reports but on the future publications of entire newspapers whose content had been
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-106928
14 septembre 2011
The judgment was also included into the printed collection of the selected judgments of the European Court of Human Rights II prepared by the Representative of Montenegro before ECtHR.
CASELAW;REPORTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1207REP001411788
7 décembre 1994
   Article 158, par. 1     "Reisicumhura muvacehesinde hakaret ve sövme fiillerini işleyenler üç seneden aşağĸ olmamak üzere ağĸr hapis cezasĸ ile cezalandĸrĸlĸr."
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0411JUD004879814
11 avril 2019
term, for two-thirds of which she would not be eligible for any form of release; and on 17   December 2008 the same assize court imposed a seventeen-year term, to run concurrently with the previous
ECLI:CEDH:001-142259
4 mars 2014
Home Office guidance indicated that this requirement should be seen as applying to anyone under the age of seventeen.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0122DEC002073005
22 janvier 2007
It found it established that on 9 August 2003, when the applicant was sixteen years old and his cousin seventeen, jointly they had threatened a young man, an Italian tourist, with a knife in order to steal
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0327JUD007135401
27 mars 2007
    In the course of the criminal proceedings, the Diyarbakır State Security Court held thirty hearings and heard seventeen witnesses. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1210DEC003361410
10 décembre 2013
    On 7 February 2002 the Court of Cassation upheld the decision of the first-instance court in respect of seventeen of the accused village guards.
ECLI:CEDH:001-192534
19 mars 2019
On 11 November 2004 the Supreme Court quashed the judgment of 29   June 2004 on appeal, having found that ten out of twelve members of the jury had been selected from the list of jurors of 2003, instead
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0426JUD004045798
26 avril 2001
    They thus lasted six years, six months and seventeen days for two instances. B.     R easonableness of the length of the proceedings 29.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0314DEC003737197
14 mars 2000
With regard to Mr Nicholas's specific case, the reasons he was not selected are known to both himself and the Government agencies concerned through correspondence dating from 1991.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0329JUD004711799
29 mars 2005
They therefore lasted seventeen years, nine months and fourteen days. 22.
Page 26 sur 137
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.