CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 727 résultats pour « Seletene »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CA

Pôle 6 - Chambre 3

60320883e69107406471029c

Appel

15 mai 2018

15 mai 2018

par Me Aline PRONIER, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES, toque : 550 INTIMEE SARL CLINALLIANCE PARIS BUTTES CHAUMONT [Adresse 2] [Adresse 2] N° SIRET : 441 637 402 représentée par Me Claire SELLERIN-CLABASSI

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0910DEC001254318

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2024

10 septembre 2024

They submitted seventeen decisions of the domestic commercial courts, rendered in 2012 and 2013, in which the final decisions of commercial courts on the opening and closing of bankruptcy proceedings were

Source officielle
TA

6ème Chambre

DTA_2202397_20231219

Administratif

19 décembre 2023

19 décembre 2023

qu'elle était inapte à ses fonctions ; - si elle a été hospitalisée en juillet 2009, dans le service de neurochirurgie du centre hospitalier de Mulhouse pour la prise en charge d'un infarctus cérébral selvien

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110566

Admin. suprême

20 février 2012

20 février 2012

He describes the conditions of his detention in Jilava Prison as follows: general overcrowding, the applicant having shared a twenty sq. m cell with seventeen to eighteen inmates; poor hygiene that is

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0328JUD004120398

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2000

28 mars 2000

;     JUDGMENT     STRASBOURG   28 March 2000     This judgment is subject to editorial revision before its reproduction in final form in the official reports of selected

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2289

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2008

29 janvier 2008

The applicant had been selected for detention on the basis that his case was suited for fast-track processing. The national authorities had thus acted in good faith in detaining the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0407DEC002586107

Admin. suprême

7 avril 2009

7 avril 2009

On 5 June 2006 the Thessaloniki Assize Court sentenced him to seventeen years' imprisonment and to a fine of 17,000   euros (decision no.   824/2006).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9896

Admin. suprême

29 octobre 1992

29 octobre 1992

Conclusion : Ireland to pay Dublin Well Woman specified sum in respect of damage (seventeen votes to six) and to Dublin Well Woman and Open Door for costs (unanimously).

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2899247-3189363

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2009

20 octobre 2009

  At the same time, the Court noted that the suspensions of the publications had not been imposed only on selected reports but on the future publications of entire newspapers whose content had been

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-106928

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2011

14 septembre 2011

The judgment was also included into the printed collection of the selected judgments of the European Court of Human Rights II prepared by the Representative of Montenegro before ECtHR.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1207REP001411788

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 1994

7 décembre 1994

   Article 158, par. 1     "Reisicumhura muvacehesinde hakaret ve sövme fiillerini işleyenler üç seneden aşağĸ olmamak üzere ağĸr hapis cezasĸ ile cezalandĸrĸlĸr."

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0411JUD004879814

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2019

11 avril 2019

term, for two-thirds of which she would not be eligible for any form of release; and on 17   December 2008 the same assize court imposed a seventeen-year term, to run concurrently with the previous

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-142259

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2014

4 mars 2014

Home Office guidance indicated that this requirement should be seen as applying to anyone under the age of seventeen.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0122DEC002073005

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2007

22 janvier 2007

It found it established that on 9 August 2003, when the applicant was sixteen years old and his cousin seventeen, jointly they had threatened a young man, an Italian tourist, with a knife in order to steal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0327JUD007135401

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2007

27 mars 2007

    In the course of the criminal proceedings, the Diyarbakır State Security Court held thirty hearings and heard seventeen witnesses. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1210DEC003361410

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2013

10 décembre 2013

    On 7 February 2002 the Court of Cassation upheld the decision of the first-instance court in respect of seventeen of the accused village guards.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-192534

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2019

19 mars 2019

On 11 November 2004 the Supreme Court quashed the judgment of 29   June 2004 on appeal, having found that ten out of twelve members of the jury had been selected from the list of jurors of 2003, instead

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0426JUD004045798

Admin. suprême

26 avril 2001

26 avril 2001

    They thus lasted six years, six months and seventeen days for two instances. B.     R easonableness of the length of the proceedings 29.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0314DEC003737197

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2000

14 mars 2000

With regard to Mr Nicholas's specific case, the reasons he was not selected are known to both himself and the Government agencies concerned through correspondence dating from 1991.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0329JUD004711799

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2005

29 mars 2005

They therefore lasted seventeen years, nine months and fourteen days. 22.

Source officielle

Page 26 sur 137

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.