30818/19 25/05/2019 Yuriy Aleksandrovich SMIRNOV 1970 Roman Nikolayevich Tsypyshev Krasnoyarsk IK-3 Ryazan Region 01/07/2016 pending More than 6 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 12 day(s)   120 inmate

  The Court has previously considered that the procedure under sections   96 and 97 of the Constitutional Court Act was not a remedy to exhaust (see Sergey Smirnov v.

  75520/01, §§   56 ‑ 57, 6   December   2007, and Aleksandr Smirnov v. Ukraine , no.

Court has considered that in such a situation, the absence of a prior judicial warrant may be counterbalanced by the availability of a retrospective judicial review (see Heino , cited above, § 45, and Smirnov

in a democratic society, that is, it must correspond to a pressing social need and avoid placing a disproportionate individual burden on the person subject to interference (see, among many others, Smirnov

Smirnov, Ms   O. Ocheretyanaya , Ms   Z. Bereza , Mr   S. Grigorenko, Mr   S. Klykovskiy, Ms   O. Zinchenko , Ms   K.

  6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings     43965/22* 18/08/2022 Vadim Vitalyevich SMIRNOV 1967

applicant sustained injuries when he was under control of police: his own accounts of relevant circumstances are contradictory and medical evidence is not conclusive (for relevant examples, see Aleksandr Smirnov

Regard being had to all the circumstances, the Court concludes that in the present case the overall length of the proceedings was not excessive and cannot be considered unreasonable (see, for example, Smirnov

and seizure in the applicant’s flat, while declaring inadmissible a complaint about a failure to return his computer on the ground that the retention decision was not amenable to judicial review (see Smirnov

Smirnov ,   Advisers .   The Court heard addresses by Mr Ioffe, Ms Reine, Mr Schabas and Mr   Matyushkin. 11.

Smirnov ,   Advisers ; (b)     for the applicants Mr   I. Kamiński , Mr   B. Sochański ,   Counsel , Mr   J. Szewczyk , Mr   R. Nowosielski , Ms   A.

Smirnov , Ms   O. Ocheretyanaya ,   Advisers ; (b)     for the applicants Mr   V. Palchinskii, representative of Mr Svinarenko ,   Counsel , Mr   E.

consequent re ‑ openings of the investigation, the Court considers that those decisions disclose serious deficiencies in the investigation resulting from structural problems in Ukraine (see Aleksandr Smirnov

consistently been deemed “legitimate” by the Court since it pursues the interests of public safety and has to do with the prevention of crime and the protection of the rights of others (see, for example, Smirnov

The Government have not shown that this ex post factum review was efficient and able to counterbalance the absence of a prior judicial order (see Gutsanovi , cited above, § 222, and Smirnov v.

furniture, poor quality of food Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport   49597/18* 01/10/2018 Andrey Aleksandrovich SMIRNOV

Smirnov (all complaints), Mr   D.I. Karlov (all complaints), Mr A.V. Borodin (in respect of IZ-63/1 in 2001), Mr N.R. Kofinullov (all complaints), Mr V.M. Kapitonov (all complaints), Mr V.S.

Smirnov ,   Ms M. Zinoveva ,   Mr N. Chestnykh ,   Mr R. Lesnikov ,   Mr V. Oleynik ,   Mr D. Gazizov ,   Advisors ; (b)     for the applicant Ms A.

Turkey , nos. 71912/01, 26968/02 and 36397/03, § 54, 10 March 2009, and Aleksandr Smirnov v.   Ukraine , no. 38683/06, § 57, 15 July 2010). 105.