In this connection, they also relied on Article 13 of the Convention.   QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

Certain applicants alleged violation of Article   13 of the Convention that there was no effective remedy under Turkish law. THE LAW I.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 40.

    COMPLAINTS           The applicant complains under Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the

    The applicants also made accessory complaints under assorted Articles of the Convention. THE LAW 1.

All applicants complained under Article 11 of the Convention, and some of them in addition under Article 10 of the Convention, that their convictions and the suspension of the pronouncement of the judgments

been introduced out of time and must be rejected in accordance with Article   35 §§   1 and 4 of the Convention.

  Assessing various factors, the Court considered that Mr Ringeisen should be afforded just satisfaction and in a judgment of 22 June 1972 fixed at 20 000 German marks   the overall sum to be

; that there had been no violation of Article 6 and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the enforcement of the judgments of 22 May 2007 and 21 August 2007; that there had been a violation of Article

They relied on Article   5   §   3 of the Convention. 8.

  17599/05) delivered on 22 October 2009, in particular to the finding under Article 46 of the Convention that overcrowding in Polish prisons and remand centres revealed a structural problem, Having

    The case concerns complaints under Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention, and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.

L’article 35 § 1 de la Convention doit ainsi être appliqué avec une certaine souplesse et sans formalisme excessif.

COMPLAINT Without invoking any specific Articles of the Convention, the applicant complained that he was subjected to compulsory care orders.

Relying on Article 6 of the Convention, the applicants complain, in particular, that their convictions were based on unlawful evidence and were politically motivated, aimed at punishing them for their

COMPLAINTS The applicants complain that they are detained in inhuman and degrading conditions, contrary to Article 3 of the Convention. QUESTIONS 1.

The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 of the Convention and under Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention concerning the application of retrospective legislation (Article 1 § 218 of Law

  23686/13, 52635/13, 15803/14, 32501/14, 45811/14 and 56742/14 respectively) under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, complaints of Ms   Shlyapkina (application no. 52635/13) under Articles &#

        The applicant company relies on Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention, arguing that the proceedings at issue were "civil" within the meaning of Article 6 para. 1 of