277 ‑ A; Lala v. the Netherlands , 22 September 1994, §   30, Series A no.

Court H.R., Asch judgment of 26 April 1991, series A no. 203, p. 10, para. 25, and Lala and Pelladoah judgments of 22 September 1994, to be published in Series A nos. 297-A and B, paras. 26 and 33, respectively

    In the interests of a fair and just criminal process it is of capital importance that the accused should appear at his trial (see Lala v.

Before designating him thus, the authorities had searched for the applicant at the nomads' camp ( campo nomadi ) where he was said to be living.

He said that he had seen the hearings of A., B. and C. on 2 June 1992 via a TV- monitor.

Consequently, such authorities have no standing to make an application to the Court under Article 34 of the Convention in international law, however autonomous they may be from the said organs (see Assanidze

SZ said that he would try to do so and they agreed that the applicant would go to SZ’s flat. Shortly afterwards, OZ called the applicant and asked him to buy heroin for her.

Relevant excerpts from the record of the proceedings read: “the lawyer [S.S.] said, “I represented the accused [Besnik Cani] by means of a power of attorney during [the proceedings in] the first-instance

It could therefore not be said that the applicant’s confessions had been made in breach of his privilege against self-incrimination or right to defend himself.

In it the applicant also said that he had made his statement without physical or psychological coercion.

    The applicants are: 1)      Ms Laylya Yesiyeva, born in 1937; 2)      Ms Zulkahn Dzukayeva, born in 1973; 3)      Mr Ziaudi Yesiyev

born in 1964, 9) Ms Kheda Idrisova (also known as Ismailova), born in 1981, 10) Mr Ramzan Ismailov, born in 1982, 11) Ms Khazan Ismailova, born in 1984, 12) Ms Larisa Ismailova, born in 1986, 13) Ms Laila

Lallas, a lawyer practising in Athens. The Greek Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent’s delegate, Ms A. Magrippi, legal representative A at the State Legal Council. 3.

This was borne out by the fact that, at the hearings on 25 February and 24 March 2000, the applicant had said that he could speak Italian and that he had understood the charges against him.

He said that he had seen the examinations of A., B. and C. on 2 June 1992 via a TV-monitor.