36494/02, § 23 et seq., 24 February 2005; Wasserman v. Russia , no. 15021/02, § 35 et seq., 18   November 2004; Burdov v. Russia , cited above, § 34 et seq.). 31.

.; Wasserman v. Russia , no. 15021/02, § 35 et seq., 18 November 2004; and Gerasimova v. Russia , no. 24669/02, §   17 et seq., 13 October 2005). 30.

Wagemans, avocat à Bruxelles. Le gouvernement belge («   le Gouvernement   ») est représenté par son agent, M. Claude Debrulle, Directeur général au ministère de la Justice. 3.

    For relevant provisions of Russian law on enforcement of court judgments against budget-funded organisations see Wasserma   v.   Russia (dec., no.

Russia , no. 25964/02, 24 February 2005; Wasserman v.

.; Wasserman v. Russia , no. 15021/02, § 35 et seq., 18   November 2004; Burdov v. Russia , no. 59498/00, § 34 et seq., ECHR 2002 ‑ III). 27.

fondé du motif économique ; que ce secteur d'activité regroupe de nombreuses sociétés dispersées dans le monde et produisant des instruments d'écriture de différentes marques et notamment Parker, Waterman

VOLOKITIN 09/11/2006 09/02/2007 33707/05 VOLOSKOVA 01/02/2007 01/05/2007 33728/05 VORONINA 01/02/2007 01/05/2007 5225/06 VYALYKH 22/02/2007 22/05/2007 35824/04 VYDRINA 29/03/2007 29/06/2007 15021/02 WASSERMAN

Germany (dec.), no. 34499/04 , 7 February 2008; Wasserman v. Russia (no. 2) , no.   21071/05, § 31 in fine , 10 April 2008; Burdov v. Russia (no. 2) , no.

These criteria, which also apply to non-enforcement cases (see Wasserman , cited above, §§ 49 and 51), are as follows: –     an action for compensation must be heard within a reasonable time

Ces critères, valables également dans les affaires d’inexécution ( Wasserman , précité, §§ 49 et 51), sont les suivants : – l’action en indemnisation doit être tranchée dans un délai raisonnable ( Scordino

effective domestic remedy in respect of their right to have the final judgments in their favour enforced fully and in a timely manner, as required by Article 13 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis , Wasserman

VOLOKITIN 09/11/2006 09/02/2007 33707/05 VOLOSKOVA 01/02/2007 01/05/2007 33728/05 VORONINA 01/02/2007 01/05/2007 5225/06 VYALYKH 22/02/2007 22/05/2007 35824/04 VYDRINA 29/03/2007 29/06/2007 15021/02 WASSERMAN

Russia , no. 25964/02, 24 February 2005; Wasserman v.

Russia , no. 25964/02, 24   February 2005; Wasserman v. Russia (no. 1) , no. 15021/02, 18   November 2004). 32.

The domestic judgment cited by the Government as awarding non-pecuniary damage on the basis of the existing provisions does not allow the Court to depart from its conclusion (see also Wasserman v.

Russie , n o 23202/05, § 39, 8 octobre 2009, et Wasserman c.   Russie , n o 15021/02, § 50, 18 novembre 2004).

Ukraine , cited above, § 64; Kudła , cited above, §§ 157-158; and Wasserman v. Russia (no.   2) , no. 21071/05 , § 45, 10 April 2008). 45.

  36494/02, §§ 23 et seq., 24   February 2005; Wasserman v. Russia , no. 15021/02, §§ 35 et seq., 18   November 2004; Burdov   v. Russia , no.