In deciding that issue, it had to take into account the circumstances of the case, including what had motivated the applicant’s statement, the legal and factual base, the actual wording used and its possible

It was therefore not for the domestic courts or for the Court to substitute their own views for those of the media as to what technique of reporting journalists should adopt.

xa0;   Concerning both Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 and Article 8 of the Convention:   In particular, did the national authorities enjoy a margin of appreciation in the matter and, if so, to what

It is unclear what their subsequent course was.

A State’s obligation under Article   8 to protect an applicant’s reputation might arise where the statements went beyond the limits of what was considered acceptable under Article   10.

Freedom of expression Conviction of blogger for publishing post using unconstitutional (Nazi) symbol: inadmissible Facts – The applicant is a blogger who produced a series of six posts complaining of what

On the basis of his examination of the applicant and what he was told by her sister-in-law, the examining doctor diagnosed psychosis.

What are the dimensions of the cells where the applicant was detained? How many persons were detained in each of these cells simultaneously with the applicant and for how long?

    What was the total duration of the applicant’s detention in an individual unit (see Öcalan , cited above, §§ 137-45, and Bora v. Turkey (dec.), no.

From what the applicant had heard, a relative of the woman helped her flee. On 15 October 2008 the Migration Board ( Migrationsverket ) rejected the asylum application.

The aggregate amount [would] be increased by EUR 2,000 if what [was] at stake in the dispute [was] of a certain importance, such as in cases concerning labour law, civil status and capacity, pensions,

However, the key problem was that it was not clear what the legal regime for the change of the sex/gender marker actually was in Georgia.

It was unclear by reference to what standards and on the basis of what information the authorities would determine, if at all, the relevant risk.

    What remedies are available to persons regarding the determination of their property claims akin to the applicants (i.e., reliance on Ottoman land registry records without being in possession

  In particular,   (a)     What was the reason for the applicant’s arrest and subsequent search?

In particular, what was the domestic law on the transitory applicability of the Act on Protracted Court Proceedings in Family Matters for proceedings that were already pending when the said Act entered

By an appeal judgment of 29 April 2016, confirming a first-instance judgment, the applicant’s administrative challenge to what he claimed was an abusive action was dismissed.

That in itself did not undermine the rights of the parties to the proceedings; what was of importance was that they had been given an opportunity personally to participate in the court proceedings.