impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right

:center; font-size:8pt } .s2490CDBC { border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:

page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 27 March 2023   SECOND SECTION Application no. 53133/22 Danijel

Poland Daniel CHRZANOWSKI 1992 Sieradz Polish   Monika Małgorzata GĄSIOROWSKA 10/05/2024 14/05/2024 10,000 4. 54808/21 25/10/2021 Nowakowski v.

5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 48899/20 Zoltán József KORDÉ against Hungary The European Court of Human Rights

ȘERBAN against Romania (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 13   September 2018 as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President

:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style

Lastly, the applicant company complains, relying on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, that the application of the freezing order infringed its property rights.

:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width

Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Vincent A.

Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 31549/23 Andrej KOLLÁR against Slovakia (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 44980/20 Margit MOJZES against Hungary (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights

    Principal facts   The applicant, Mr Daniel   Féret, is a Belgian national who was born in 1944 and lives in Brussels.

inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 55374/16 GHIOFRIG S.R.L. against the Republic of Moldova The European Court of Human Rights

Hungary Imre László RENDEK 1976 Szeged Dániel András KARSAI 05/06/2006 35 years 1,800 6. 58544/19 04/11/2019 Tóth v.

:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7CB6920E { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080;

They complain that the three deceased were intentionally deprived of their right to life by the use of unnecessary, unlawful force, without any attempt to effect a lawful arrest.

  Complaint   The applicants complain that they had not had access to a “tribunal”, within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) of the European Convention on Human Rights, for

font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 400/15 Kálmánné FÁBIÁNFY against Hungary and 10 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights

DUMBRAVĂ against Romania (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 29   November 2018 as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President