In its Chamber judgment of 20 December 2001 the Court held, unanimously, that there had been no violation of Article 11 (right to association) in the case.

  The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded the applicant 30,000 Lithuanian litai (LTL) for non-pecuniary damage and LTL 70,000 for costs and expenses

Pursuant to that provision, the Messina magistrate held that the accused had no case to answer.

He was held in detention until 20 September 1995 and questioned regularly about his links with the LTTE.

therapeutic treatment Article 3 Degrading treatment Structural problem resulting in detention for more than nine years in psychiatric wing of prison with no prospect of change or appropriate medical help

The Court held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 6 § 1 (access to court) of the Convention. (The judgment is available only in French.)   (3)     Diaz Aparicio v.

#Tagállami kötelezettségszegés - EK 49. cikk - Szociális biztonság - Másik tagállamban való ideiglenes tartózkodás alatt szükséges kórházi ellátások - Az illetékes intézmény a tartózkodási hely szerinti

#Appel – EF-varemærker – ordmærket HELLIM – indsigelse fra indehaveren af EF-ordmærket HALLOUMI – indsigelsen forkastet.#Sag C-393/12 P.

#Gemenskapsvarumärke - Invändningsförfarande - Underlåtelse att betala invändningsavgiften - Beslut som fastställer att någon invändning inte har framställts - Uppenbart att talan helt saknar rättslig

22-13.959 Demandeur(s) : la société civile des propriétaires des deux maisons sises à [Adresse 4] Avocat(s) : la SARL Boré, Salve de Bruneton et Mégret Défendeur(s) : la société Helis

Elle soutient que : - les revenus tirés de la location des locaux et annexes situés 54 rue Saint-Hélier à Rennes et loués à l’Association hospitalière Saint-Hélier sont constitutifs de recettes procurées

The domestic courts held that the State was liable and awarded damages to the applicant.

The Court also held unanimously that there had been a breach of Mr Rushiti’s right to be presumed innocent as guaranteed by Article 6 § 2.

It held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

We hope that this will reach a wider range of government officials, judges, lawyers and academics, who will in turn help to establish a more comprehensive understanding of the Convention and its practical

today in Strasbourg, Mr Wildhaber said: “I hope the idea of an annual European Day of Civil Justice, born out of collaboration between the Council of Europe and the European Union’s Commission, will help

    After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.

It dismissed the Government’s preliminary objection and held that:   there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) of the European Convention on Human Rights, taken together