On the contrary, the records reflected a certain improvement in his attitude towards his previous suicide attempt.

his own sentence.

The applicant repeated that his lawyer had offered him a small apartment and work in his law firm.

Prior to his confession, there had been no independent evidence pointing to his presence at the scene on the crime.

on his buttocks measuring 7 cm by 6 cm and 6 cm by 2.5 cm.

Therefore, the court finds it substantiated that due to tension between [the applicant] and his wife, meetings with his child in the absence of his wife best suit the well ‑ being of the child.”

not have the means for his maintenance.

had not told his lawyers of his informant status was because his handlers had put pressure on him not to.

his family.

Date de l'acte de saisine : 14 Novembre 2024 Date de saisine : 27 Novembre 2024 Nature de l'affaire : Appel contre des décisions prononçant la liquidation judiciaire Décision attaquée : n° 23/00069 rendue

  He, therefore, applied for legal aid for his trial.

    The applicant appealed, complaining, among other matters, that that decision in the part relating to his detention was unlawful and that it had been delivered in his and his lawyer’s absence

According to the first applicant, Mrs   Nicolaou, her son had asked her to contact his superiors and arrange for his transfer to another unit as he was unhappy with his stay at the camp.

M.D. therefore approached him and twisted his arm behind his back after which he was handcuffed. 11.

In the meantime another judge to whom the case was assigned terminated his service at the District Court.

his prior dismissal.

It was not his first suicide attempt. 10.

By accepting the plea bargain, the first applicant had waived his right to ordinary appellate review, a legal consequence that would or should have been explained to him by his lawyers.

for the applicant the President of the Bar Council informed the judge that the reasons given by the assigned lawyers for seeking a release had “primarily” been the applicant’s failure to cooperate and his

Article 8 “Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.” 19.