CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0405JUD003438297
5 avril 2000
    In order to settle the first part of the application, the respondent Government has agreed to pay to the applicant Government an amount ex gratia of DKK   450,000 [Danish kroner] which
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111561
4 juin 2009
  Gladõšev’s appeal was refused by the Supreme Court because of his failure to pay the court fee of 400 kroons (EEK, corresponding to approximately 26 euros (EUR)).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1120DEC003905097
20 novembre 2001
under Article 8 of the Convention, the Court recalls that the essential object of this provision is to protect the individual against arbitrary action by the public authorities (see , mutatis mutandis , Kroon
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1213DEC007007201
13 décembre 2005
The shares were sold at a price exceeding the real value by about 2 million Swedish kroner (SEK), equivalent to approximately 209,765 euros (EUR), in order to procure an improper profit for N.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1266046-1329558
24 février 2005
He was convicted, but his fine was reduced by 40,000 Danish kroner (DKK) in view of the length of the proceedings.
ECLI:CEDH:001-116334
11 février 2011
On 9 March 2006 L.’s lawyers requested the applicant company to remove the offensive comments and claimed 500,000 kroons (EEK) (approximately 32,000 euros (EUR)) for non-pecuniary damage.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1005DEC001200786
5 octobre 1987
On 11 April 1984 the newspaper "Neue Kronenzeitung - Kärntner Krone" published a newspaper article on these proceedings in which it stated inter alia:   <Translation>      
ECLI:CEDH:001-126951
9 septembre 2013
They also received a book with 100 Danish kroner (DKK) (approximately 13 euros (EUR)).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0118JUD003506203
18 janvier 2007
According to an expert opinion the current value of the apartment was 119,337 kroons (EEK) (corresponding approximately to 7,700 euros (EUR)).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0326JUD002646106
26 mars 2009
The Partnership’s assets, including the individual partners’ assets, were estimated at about 8 million Danish kroner (DKK), while its liabilities were estimated at DKK 15 million.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1213JUD006629801
whose criminal proceedings were a subject of great public interest, in his escape, had entered the public arena and she, therefore, had to bear the consequences of her decision (see, mutatis mutandis , Krone
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0712JUD006849001
12 juillet 2007
The general rule with regard to compensation claims lodged with an administrative court (section 56 (11) of the State Fees Act) is that a state fee of 3 % of the amount claimed - but not less than 80 kroons
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1021JUD001675624
21 octobre 2025
xa0;   By a judgment of 18 November 2022, the District Court convicted the applicant of defamation, holding that the term “Nazi” had been unfounded, sentenced him to 10 day-fines of 1,000 Danish kroner
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0716JUD003943813
16 juillet 2015
According to the Court’s case-law, respect for family life required that biological and social reality should prevail over a legal presumption of paternity (the Government cited Kroon and Others v. the
Chambre sociale
64a660a0bbd03a05db96543d
5 juillet 2023
Or, le 30 septembre 2019, il ressort un écart d'inventaire de 25 fûts de bière de 30L KRO d'un montant de 1293,38 euros pour lesquels vous n'arrivez pas à justifier l'écart'.
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGHEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2366407-2570411
9 juin 2008
  The broadcasts were shown between 14   August and 13   September 2003 at a cost of 30,000   Norwegian   kroner   (NOK) (approximately EUR 3,730) to the party.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1117DEC000780205
17 novembre 2009
actually benefiting anyone, is not compatible, even having regard to the margin of appreciation left to the State, with the obligation to secure effective “respect” for private and family life (see Kroon
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0628DEC002594694
28 juin 1995
Court H.R., Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 October 1994, Series A no. 297-C, para. 30).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0824DEC000490104
24 août 2010
être compatible avec l'obligation de garantir le «   respect   » effectif de la vie privée et familiale, même eu égard à la marge d'appréciation dont jouissent les États ( mutatis mutandis , Kroon
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0427DEC004297398
27 avril 2000
Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 October 1994, Series A no. 297-C, p. 56, § 31; and X, Y and Z v. the United Kingdom judgment of 22 April 1997, p. 631, § 41).
Page 28 sur 43
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.