de nationalité Française [Adresse 7] [Localité 9] Madame [X] [H] née le [Date naissance 1] 1955 à [Localité 11] de nationalité Française [Adresse 7] [Localité 9] Représentés par Me Anne Policella

PHARMA FB [Adresse 4] [Localité 3] représentée par Me Anne POLICELLA, avocat au barreau de LILLE INTIMÉ : M.

[N] [O] [Adresse 2] [Localité 1] représenté par Me Anne POLICELLA, avocat au barreau de LILLE substitué par Me Mathieu VILLARS, avocat au barreau de LILLE INTIMÉE : Société DECATHLON (SOCIETE

The Court is satisfied that the police’s actions were adequate.

It was established that T.M. had trained as a policeman.

It referred to the gravity of the charges and information about the applicant’s character, including a report by Moscow Police’s chief of department at the Centre for Counter-Extremism.

In particular, he alleged that the district court should have excluded all evidence from the file because it had been based on the police’s examinations of X’s and his own mobile telephone without the

Despite the police’s order to stop what they were doing, the entrepreneurs refused; thereafter the police approached [the defendant], who appeared particularly active, and again ordered him to stop what

In that judgment it was established that prior to the police’s order made by telephone there had been an arrangement that he would receive a ten kilo narcotics shipment.

The court held that the recurrent assembly had been impeded and that the police’s actions had a legal basis in, inter alia , the Police Act – namely section   1(2)(2) and sections 14 and 15 thereof

The applicant had climbed on the cupboard in her cell and passed the night thereon, failing to comply with the police’s order to descend.

Among other things, there had been no effective mechanism for the applicant in his situation to claim monetary compensation for the police’s actions. 50.

at the police station when the applicant, her sister and her sister’s husband arrived, stated that: “The people [the police officer] brought with him were inebriated, were shouting, insulting the policeman

by the applicant; the comments submitted by Human Rights Centre of Ghent University, the French Défenseur des droits (Defender of Rights), Rights International Spain and Plataforma por la Gestión Policial

  The policeman L. had requested the applicant and O. to open the gate and to come to the local police station.

Some time later, policeman B. was charged with abuse of office under Article 286 of the Criminal Code.

The District Court established that on 2 July 1993 the applicant had driven his car at a policeman who had attempted to stop him after he had committed a road traffic offence.

  In accordance with the statements of [the bank clerks and a policeman] it is without any doubt that the course of events concerning the robbery was similar to what the prosecutor has alleged.

At the trial, the court questioned as a witness L., the policeman who had arrested the applicant, who stated that he had not used physical coercion against the applicant.