CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122JUD003311702
22 janvier 2013
On 30 August 2000 the Omsk Regional Court upheld the decision of the District Court. 11.
Page 29 sur 58
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1112JUD004841609
12 novembre 2015
On 10 June 2005 the District Court extended the applicant’s detention until 14 August 2005.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0327JUD000543207
27 mars 2012
On 7 November 2001 the first applicant reported the abduction of Aset Yakhyayeva and Milana Betilgiriyeva to the prosecutor’s office for the Shalinskiy District (“the district prosecutor’
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0612JUD000254608
12 juin 2012
On 19 May 2007 the Sovietskiy district prosecutor’s office of Makhachkala (the district prosecutor’s office) initiated a criminal investigation into the disappearance of Ramazan Umarov under
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0530JUD002172403
30 mai 2013
On the same day, the first applicant applied to the Leninskiy District Court for a stay in the enforcement proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0710JUD005055213
10 juillet 2014
On the same date the case file was forwarded to the Kuntsevskiy District Court of Moscow.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110JUD003346803
10 janvier 2012
The District Court’s pronouncements were reproduced verbatim in the judgment of the Krasnodar Regional Court. 36.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1008JUD002744707
8 octobre 2015
On 11 April 2007 the Orel Regional Court upheld the District Court’s judgment on the merits but partly amended it.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0129JUD001571113
29 janvier 2015
On 8 December 2010 the Dorogomilovskiy District Court of Moscow (“the District Court”) granted the claim of the Moscow Housing Department.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-794011-811071
15 juillet 2003
At the District Court trial evidence was heard from both defendants and 20 witnesses. The witness accounts of the incident diverged considerably.
1re chambre sociale
635b71fab201587f74be031e
27 octobre 2022
[Adresse 1] [Adresse 1] Représentée par Maître Alexandra DENJEAN DUHIL DE BENAZE de la SELARL LEXEM CONSEIL, avocat postulant au barreau de MONTPELLIER et Maître BRUNA Hugo, substituant Maître Raymond
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:003-2967413-3271663
15 décembre 2009
Moldova (n° 25464/05) Le requérant, Alexandru Gavrilovici, est un ressortissant moldave né en 1954 et résidant à Palanca (Moldova).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0416JUD004725719
16 avril 2026
10,000 Not requested 10100/23 22/02/2023 Ioana-Lucia HARCA 1938 Ispravnic Roxana Valentina Bucuresti equivalent plot of land or compensation to 1.4 ha land located in the 1 st District
ECLI:CEDH:003-1386209-1463103
15 juillet 2005
Le 9 févier 1998, le tribunal de district de Sofia ordonna la mise en liberté du requérant sous contrôle judiciaire.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0414DEC003583907
14 avril 2015
On 6 September 2005 the Drăgăşani District Court found in favour of the applicant parish. On 19 January 2006 the Vâlcea County Court upheld the decision, which thus became final.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1208DEC005693613
8 décembre 2015
By letter dated 9 February 2012 the applicant appealed to the Appeal Court, requesting that the District Court judgment be quashed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1023JUD003385605
23 octobre 2014
On 11 December 2004 the Avtozavodskiy District Court of Togliatti (“the district court”) convicted the applicant as charged and sentenced him to seven years’ imprisonment and a fine of 10,000
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0719JUD002329405
19 juillet 2011
On 28 November 2001 the prosecutor of the Tsentralnyy District of St Petersburg authorised the applicant’s pre-trial detention in accordance with the old Code of Criminal Procedure
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE
Chiragov et autresc/Arménie
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD001321605
12 décembre 2017
Arménie, La Cour européenne des droits de l’homme, siégeant en une Grande Chambre composée de : Guido Raimondi, président, Angelika Nußberger, Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0925JUD001012018
25 septembre 2025
On 24 April 2012 the Buiucani District Court ordered C.M. to pay the claimants the salary arrears in specific amounts and also awarded each of them 5,000 Moldovan lei (MDL) in compensation