neuf cent quatre-vingt-dix-neuf, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le rapport de M. le conseiller GRAPINET, les observations de Me RICARD, avocat en la Cour, et les conclusions de Mme l'avocat général COMMARET

The Administrative Court and subsequently the Conseil d’Etat dismissed its claim on the ground, among other things, that a Directive could not be directly invoked against a provision of national law.

On 7 February 1997 the applicant lodged a civil claim as instructed. The civil proceedings ended in 2000.

    The applicant made no claim under this head. C.     Default interest 37.

    The Government contested the claim. 68.

    The Whinney Murray Report then compared these figures with those applicable to Scott Lithgow.

les avait indemnisés, la cour d'appel a privé sa décision de base légale au regard de l'article 1382 du code civil ; 4°/ que le juge doit se prononcer par des motifs qui permettent d'identifier clairement

The CAS dismissed both arbitration claims in a ruling of 30 April 2019. 8.     The applicant association and M.C.

  In its decision on the merits, on 13 May 2004, the court finally rejected the singer’s claim for damages and lifted the seizure order on the book.

As a result, his brother had been able to claim his share of the estate and inherit from the first applicant’s daughter.

As the appellants in the case in question could not have their case decided by the Labour Court, the Supreme Administrative Court examined their claim but rejected it on the merits.

The number of canteen tables and chairs was insufficient compared to the number of people eating.

Nor could the present case be compared to those concerning mandatory confiscation in connection with custom offences (in relation to concealed or exported goods, undeclared cash) or related to vehicles

Lastly, the applicant community complained under Article 14 of the Convention in conjunction with Article 9 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that it had been discriminated against compared

The fact that the appellant’s tasks and obligations to society cannot be compared to the statutory tasks and obligations of the State Church is in and of itself sufficient reason to determine that the

référendaire VALAT, les observations de la société civile professionnelle TIFFREAU, et de la société civile professionnelle PIWNICA et MOLINIE, avocats en la Cour, et les conclusions de Mme l'avocat général COMMARET

de la société civile professionnelle VIER, BARTHELEMY et MATUCHANSKY, et de la société civile professionnelle WAQUET, FARGE et HAZAN, avocats en la Cour, et les conclusions de Mme l'avocat général COMMARET

Greffier lors des débats : Madame Charlotte COMBARET. Les parties ont été avisées que le prononcé public de la décision aurait lieu par mise à disposition au greffe le 17 Juillet 2014.

may file a civil claim for damages before   the competent court.