CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0312JUD000733413
12 mars 2015
Italie, n os 43517/09, 46882/09, 55400/09, 57875/09, 61535/09, 35315/10 et 37818/10, § 77, 8 janvier 2013, Kanakis c. Grèce (n o 2), n o 40146/11, §§ 106-107, 12 décembre 2013, Tatishvili c.
Page 29 sur 36
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0519JUD002974413
19 mai 2022
Grèce (n o 51618/12, §§ 17-21, 26 novembre 2013) et à son arrêt Kanakis c. Grèce (n o 2) (n o 40146/11 , § 62, 12 décembre 2013). 34.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0831JUD007058317
31 août 2023
The principles applicable to minor migrants and their special vulnerability are reiterated in, among other authorities, Mub ilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki Mitunga v.
CASELAW;REPORTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0227REP002070492
27 février 1996
Bu gibi subaylarin durumlarinin Yüksek Askeri Sûra tarafindan incelenmesi Genel Kurmay Baskanliginca gerekli görülenlerin Silahli Kuvvetlerden ayirma islemi, Yüksek Askeri Sûra karari ile yapilir.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0904DEC003859597
4 septembre 2001
Following the orders from Sergeant Serghiou of the SBA police, Constable Duru Chorekdjioglou (a Turkish-Cypriot member of the SBA police) and Constable Petros Kamaris (a Greek-Cypriot member of the SBA
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177148
28 août 2017
By decision of 11 November 2014 the Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun District Court of Yerevan (“the District Court”) dismissed the applicant’s complaint and fully upheld the decisions in question.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0405JUD007190701
5 avril 2007
margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } TROISIÈME SECTION [1] AFFAIRE KAVAKÇI
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0727JUD002822108
27 juillet 2010
Les mesures privatives de liberté s’accompagnent ordinairement de pareilles souffrance et humiliation ( Kafkaris c. Chypre [GC], n o 21906/04, §§ 95 et 96, CEDH 2008). 29.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0928DEC003169114
28 septembre 2021
The Court has acknowledged in its case-law that however clearly drafted a legal provision may be, in any system of law there is an inevitable element of judicial interpretation (see Kafkaris
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0526JUD003423809
26 mai 2015
adulte auteur d’une infraction particulièrement grave telle que l’assassinat n’est pas en soi prohibé par l’article 3 ni par aucune autre disposition de la Convention et ne se heurte pas à celle-ci ( Kafkaris
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0901JUD004815811
1 septembre 2016
En outre, la certitude, bien que hautement souhaitable, s’accompagne parfois d’une rigidité excessive ; or, le droit doit savoir s’adapter aux changements de situation ( Kafkaris c.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0505JUD003301405
5 mai 2011
conséquences mais aussi aux formalités, conditions, restrictions ou sanctions qui peuvent être attachées à ce comportement, si celui-ci est jugé contraire aux lois nationales (voir, mutatis mutandis , Kafkaris
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1218JUD000175802
18 décembre 2008
foresee the consequences, but also to “formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties", which may be attached to such conduct, if found to be in breach of the national laws (see, mutatis mutandis , Kafkaris
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122DEC000289408
22 janvier 2013
deprivation of liberty at issue (see, inter alia , Weeks v. the United Kingdom , 2 March 1987, § 42, Series A no. 114; Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295/99, § 64, ECHR 2002 ‑ IV; and Kafkaris
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0629DEC001410202
29 juin 2010
Parallèlement, la Cour a néanmoins estimé qu'infliger à un adulte une peine perpétuelle incompressible pouvait soulever une question sous l'angle de l'article 3 (voir, entre autres, Kafkaris c.
ECLI:CEDH:001-139980
12 décembre 2013
Can a life sentence, when taken with the State President’s right to pardon, be considered as an irreducible life sentence within the meaning of Kafkaris v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0914JUD005231609
14 septembre 2017
On the same day the applicant was taken to the Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun District Court of Yerevan. At the request of investigator A.K., the court ordered his remand in custody. 14.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0420JUD001024414
20 avril 2017
The relevant domestic law and practice is described in the Court’s judgment in the case of Kanakis v. Greece (no. 2) (no. 40146/11, §§ 62-68, 12 December 2013). III.
ECLI:CEDH:001-177146
On 14 November 2012 the applicants disputed the investigator’s decision of 28 July 2012 before the Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun District Court of Yerevan (the District Court), raising similar
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0121JUD001157808
21 janvier 2016
On 13 June 2007 the applicant, who was not represented by a lawyer, lodged a claim with the Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun District Court of Yerevan seeking to oblige the Factory to allocate