du point de vue du droit au respect de la vie privée (et, le cas échéant, familiale), ayant conduit à la condamnation de la requérante ne dépassent pas le plan personnel (voir, a contrario , l’arrêt Krone

Royaume-Uni du 21   février   1990, série A n 172, p. 18, § 41, et les arrêts précités Keegan et Kroon et autres c.

du point de vue du droit au respect de la vie privée (et, le cas échéant, familiale), ayant conduit à la condamnation de la requérante ne dépassent pas le plan personnel (voir, a contrario , l’arrêt Krone

the case and by indictment of the same date the applicant was charged with fraud in two instances related to transactions with his business partner involving amounts of approximately 250,000 Danish kroner

The Government were ordered to pay 40,000 Norwegian kroner (NOK) (about 4,000 euros (EUR)) in non-pecuniary redress ( oppreisning ) to each of the children and NOK   25,000 (about EUR 2,500) to each

flooring after the police had cut out a piece of parquet with a bullet mark to serve as evidence, a lock cylinder removed for evidence, cleaning bills, unpaid utility bills) in the amount of 28,259 kroons

It ordered him to pay 60,000 Norwegian kroner (NOK) (approximately 7,500 euros at that time) in compensation to Ms A for non-pecuniary damage. 8.

Kardol, Mr C. de Kreij, Mr G.J. van Lent, Mrs G. van Lent-de Kroon, Mr S.J.B.A. Pompen, Ms C.M.M. Wennekes and Mr M.

appears that the lack of a procedure for bringing the legal position into line with the biological reality is inconsistent with the wishes of those concerned and does not in fact benefit anyone (see Kroon

– was sufficiently precise for the purpose of Article 10 of the Convention and, accordingly, that an interference based on that provision was prescribed by law within the meaning of Article 10 (see, Krone

Roumanie [GC], n o   33348/96, § 22, CEDH 2004 ‑ XI), une annonce publicitaire ( Krone Verlag GmbH & Co. KG c.

    In its judgment of 16 November 1990 (Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 1991, no. 475), cited in the Court's Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 27   October 1994 (Series A no. 297

On 9 April 1999 the Board informed the applicant that her degree of disablement was calculated to 60 % and in this respect she was granted 229,227   Danish kroner (DKK) in compensation.

Moreover, the applicant has submitted no evidence to demonstrate that his relationship with his girlfriend has sufficient constancy to create family ties ( Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands , 27 October

    The applicant was ordered to compensate litigation costs of 225,480 Norwegian kroner (NOK) (approximately 24,650 euros (EUR)).

Krall , avocat,   conseil . La Cour les a entendus en leurs plaidoiries, ainsi qu’en leurs réponses à ses questions. Gouvernement et requérant ont produit des documents lors des audiences.

Norvège [GC], n o 23118/93, § 46   , CEDH 1999 ‑ VIII   ; Krone Verlag GmbH & Co. KG c. Autriche , n o 34315/96, § 35, 26 février 2002   ; Vides Aizsardzības Klubs c.

Irlande , 26 mai 1994, §   44, série A n o 290, Kroon et autres c. Pays-Bas , 27 octobre 1994, § 30, série A n o 297 ‑ C, et X, Y et Z c.

8 ne se borne pas aux seules relations fondées sur le mariage et peut englober d’autres «   liens familiaux   » de facto lorsqu’une relation a suffisamment de constance (voir, par exemple, Kroon

[I] [B] (administrateur à la faillite de la société SLOT AS) [K] 1105/36 500 02 Hradec Kralové 500 0 HRADEC KRAL (RÉPUBLIQUE TCHÈQUE) Représentées par Me Michel GUIZARD de la SELARL GUIZARD ET ASSOCIES