ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 of the Convention 7.

He raises complaints under Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention. 2.

    The Government further contended that there had been no violation of Article 8 of the Convention. 22.     The applicant reaffirmed his complaint. 23.

Some applicants also raised other complaints under various Articles of the Convention. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a breach of the State’s positive obligation of respect for the applicant’s family life, as required by Article 8 of the Convention? In particular:   1.

    The applicant complained under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the excessively long failure to enforce the domestic judgment in his favour.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 of the Convention 7.     The applicants complained principally of the various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression.

authorities, in violation of Article 14 of the Convention.

The Court has previously accepted that close relatives of applicants who have died can maintain applications that include complaints concerning various aspects of Article   6 of the Convention (see

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.

In its report of 10 September 1999 (former Article 31 of the Convention) it expressed, by 16 votes to 13, an opinion that there had been no violation of Article 3 of the Convention, and, by 22 votes to

Dès lors, la Cour conclut, à l’unanimité, à la violation de l’article 13 de la Convention.

COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article 3 of the Convention that he had been ill-treated and subjected to inhuman conditions of detention in the special type punishment ward, under Article 4

The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the

The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the

  53152/16, the applicant also raised other complaints under various Articles of the Convention. 11.

    The alleged violation of Article 5 of the Convention 14.     The applicant’s first complaint related to the length of his detention.

They relied on Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, which read as follows: Article 5 § 3 “3.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention.