CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1228987-1285560
11 janvier 2005
:always; clear:both } .s64EFF492 { width:321.31pt; display:inline-block } .s278C0F59 { width:144.68pt; display:inline-block } .s79DDB48F { width:102.14pt; display:inline-block } .s8047985E { width:86pt
Page 3 sur 451
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0119DEC001749702
19 janvier 2010
} .sB2998F02 { width:154.72pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 17497
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-424060-424448
2 octobre 2001
} .s38DD6A04 { width:18.2pt; display:inline-block } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sCB27B9E { width:16.66pt; display:inline-block } .sC5412BEF { width:51.05pt; display:inline-block
cr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:CR00951
3 mai 2017
comprenant le nom et les coordonnées du destinataire ; en haut à gauche, un bloc comprenant la date du courrier, les coordonnées de la société expéditrice et, sous ce bloc de texte, les mots : "Fax :
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2011:SO00093
11 janvier 2011
estival" dispose que : "Il est institué un "bloc estival" de 6 semaines.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0213JUD000904324
13 février 2025
:inside } .s3E875F3B { width:4.15pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s83BE5C30 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super } .s68BA070F { width:0.81pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1121DEC003234522
21 novembre 2024
} .s7FB0030E { width:111.07pt; display:inline-block } .s2055D3B3 { width:16.54pt; display:inline-block } .sA4FA8E5F { width:143.76pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0312DEC002106423
12 mars 2026
} .s27603DD6 { width:111.07pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .s935FFEBF { width:7.54pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .sDCEB1D12 { width:138.09pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0131DEC004228909
31 janvier 2017
} .sA06C9E90 { width:170.76pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s58D00DC6 { width:160.74pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1214DEC001739504
14 décembre 2010
} .s4A0CEAF8 { width:194.77pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0409DEC000328517
9 avril 2026
} .s7340DF61 { width:155.1pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .s935FFEBF { width:7.54pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .sDCEB1D12 { width:138.09pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1216DEC003458308
16 décembre 2008
} .sB2998F02 { width:154.72pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 34583
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0608DEC003532402
8 juin 2004
} .s7C119006 { width:5.02pt; display:inline-block } .s61E420C2 { font-family:Arial; font-variant:small-caps } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s93087BA9 { width:10.98pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0221DEC001164211
21 février 2017
} .s6163AF01 { width:168.94pt; display:inline-block } .s5B081A9D { width:168.28pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 11642/11 Aleksander SOKOLOW against Germany
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1109DEC001482815
9 novembre 2017
} .sA9E99AE7 { width:197.77pt; display:inline-block } .s50B7D056 { width:182.94pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1121DEC004386821
} .s7FB0030E { width:111.07pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .sBA32C63A { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0418DEC004264121
18 avril 2024
} .sC60B69EF { width:127.74pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s37CDBE05 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1119DEC003179005
19 novembre 2013
} .sC7BF4101 { width:166.26pt; display:inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s7B0354FA { width:193.28pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0911DEC005154722
11 septembre 2025
} .s3FD9E4E3 { width:138.43pt; display:inline-block } .s5D826FD4 { width:25.88pt; display:inline-block } .s1B61D60 { width:156.43pt; display:inline-block } .s1721E4C5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0914JUD002438419
14 septembre 2022
:inline-block } .sC0FFF6FB { margin:0pt 28.35pt 3pt 68.05pt; text-indent:-17pt; page-break-after:avoid; line-height:12pt } .sD46FFE5D { width:8.66pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s70E0A597