CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

50 résultats pour « Carine BAILLY LACRESSE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0604DEC003884412

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2013

4 juin 2013

On 21 April 2011, H’s bail order was revoked when he failed to attend a High Court hearing relating to his appeal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0330DEC002778595

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2000

30 mars 2000

He submits that his detention lacked any reasonable legal basis under Polish law.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1119JUD007573412

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2019

19 novembre 2019

It dismissed a request by the second applicant for bail. That decision was upheld by the Moscow City Court on 6 November 2013. D.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0522JUD005457800

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2008

22 mai 2008

    On 5 November 1999 the applicant filed another appeal against his detention and requested that bail be set.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1011DEC006068200

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2005

11 octobre 2005

It is difficult for <the applicant> to trust anyone completely, as she feels herself to have been badly let down by key figures in her life (including her mother, foster carers et al).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0610JUD002201510

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2014

10 juin 2014

    The applicant described these cells as badly lit and ventilated, humid and foul smelling.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1019JUD002778595

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2000

19 octobre 2000

The biological parents had not had any further contact with the children and had not participated in caring for them. However, they had remained in permanent contact with the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0315JUD003514106

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2012

15 mars 2012

    The applicant disputed the measure and claimed that she was capable of caring for her children, who suffered from being separated from her. 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0114JUD005111107

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2020

14 janvier 2020

No. 2)   (Applications nos. 51111/07 and 42757/07)   JUDGMENT   Art 6 § 1 (criminal) and Art 6 § 3 (c) and (d) • Fair hearing • Defence through legal assistance • Confinement in glass cabin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1203JUD007482010

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 2015

3 décembre 2015

The cabin was divided into four individual compartments, measuring some 0.5 m² each. Such a confined space is unsuitable for transporting a person, no matter how short the duration ...” THE LAW I.

Source officielle

Page 3 sur 3

← Précédent