CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0831DEC002339994
31 août 1994
Poledna, lawyers practising in Zurich.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1016REP002570694
16 octobre 1996
   The Netherlands Code of Criminal Procedure (Wetboek van Strafvordering) does not ensure the right of a lawyer to conduct the defence of an accused before a court, where the latter has been
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1127DEC002975396
27 novembre 1996
Weyer, lawyers practising in Bielefeld.   A.
CIVIL TP SAINT DENIS
662bd89de266e89ef1160dbe
22 avril 2024
JUGEMENT DU 18 MARS 2024 - JUGE DES CONTENTIEUX DE LA PROTECTION PARTIES DEMANDEUR(S) : Société CDC HABITAT REP/ CDC HABITAT OUTRE MER [Adresse 1] [Localité 2] représentée par Me Marie françoise LAW
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0104DEC006401610
4 janvier 2012
His complaint to the Viru Court of Appeal was rejected on 14 February 2008, because it had not been drawn up by a lawyer as required by law.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0312DEC004460898
12 mars 2002
In the context of the latter proceedings, the District Court dismissed the applicant’s action on 5   November 1998, holding that the competent authority had properly applied the relevant laws.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1201DEC002228793
1 décembre 1993
Pausch, a lawyer practising in Graz.   A.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0609JUD001918291
9 juin 1997
   Relevant domestic law       A.      The Telecommunications Law of 13 July 1949   17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0608DEC002760295
8 juin 1999
  Relevant domestic law and practice     i.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0429JUD001341687
29 avril 1997
AS TO THE LAW 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0228DEC002458794
28 février 1996
Furthermore, he does not call into question the personal impartiality of the other lay assessors.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0629DEC002242693
29 juin 1994
  THE LAW   1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC006635701
16 décembre 2003
Finland judgment (no. 31611/96, § 44, 21   March   2002) as follows ( loc. cit. , §§ 44–45, case-law references omitted): “44.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0706DEC003408796
6 juillet 1999
    THE LAW   1.
Chambre 1 Cabinet 1
696962e6cdc6046d4772c762
13 janvier 2026
LAMY, en la personne de son représentant légal, dont le siège social est sis [Adresse 6] représentée par Maître Alain MORHANGE, avocat au barreau de METZ, vestiaire : B111 DÉFENDEURS : Monsieur [
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1012DEC002129493
12 octobre 1994
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0907DEC003935098
7 septembre 1999
    THE LAW     1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1018DEC002380694
18 octobre 1995
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0116DEC004878499
16 janvier 2001
Later, a lawyer practising in The Hague. A.     The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0529JUD000856279
29 mai 1986
had been acting as a private person, subject to private law", and not "in its sovereign capacity" (see the same judgment, loc. cit., p. 30, para. 90).
Page 3 sur 64