CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0307JUD003828702
7 mars 2006
The application must be handwritten and signed by the person making it.
Page 3 sur 4
MATHIEU SIGAUD AVOCAT
16/12/2025
Voir →
30/09/2025
02/12/2024
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0219JUD002483994
19 février 1998
Austria; 2.3.1987, Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium; 26.10.1988, Norris v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0702DEC005318099
2 juillet 2002
Wherever disagreements appear between conventions and treaties signed by the Republic of Moldova and her own national laws, priority shall be given to international regulations.
civ1
613721bfcd580146773f6d49
10 juin 1992
Karl ZB..., 390°/ Mme Sigrid OM..., épouse ZB..., demeurant ensemble à Schonberg (RFA), Parkstrasse 18, 6242 Kronberg, 391°/ M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0925JUD001253506
25 septembre 2014
There is room for “implied limitations”, and Contracting States are given a margin of appreciation in this sphere (see Matthews v. the United Kingdom [GC], no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0218JUD002483394
18 février 1999
Ms Matthews applied to the Commission on 18 April 1994. She alleged a violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1, taken alone or in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention. 21.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0302JUD007803901
2 mars 2010
That decision was signed by six judges and six representatives of political parties. 11.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1029REP002483394
29 octobre 1997
The Council Decision itself is signed by the President of the Council and by the Ministers representing the Member States as members of the Council.
Pôle 5 - Chambre 16
631834e40876004f131a6087
6 septembre 2022
société RIWODIS Monsieur [V] [H] né le 20 Novembre 1988 à [Localité 4] demeurant : [Adresse 3] (REPUBLIQUE POPULAIRE DE CHINE) gérant de la société FUXING TRADING LIMITED Représentés par Me Matthieu
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1203JUD003770005
3 décembre 2009
Following his formal registration as a candidate, G.A. was temporarily relieved of his official duties, without pay, until 16 November 2005, pursuant to an SREA decision of 5 September 2005 signed by G.A
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0902DEC001167604
2 septembre 2004
That word has to be interpreted in the light of the constitutional structure of the State in question (see, mutatis mutandis , Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0719JUD001786404
19 juillet 2007
According to the acknowledgement-of-receipt coupon signed by the secretary of the Commission, the second applicant enclosed an application form, copies of his passport, diplomas and employment record (
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0207JUD003942402
7 février 2008
The report was signed by two voters.
cr
6137260ccd580146774228f1
14 février 2007
d'offre non recevable" ; que Claudine Y... du bureau d'études Adi Environnement a déclaré, le 22 janvier 2004, que "cette opération s'inscrit dans le contrat pluriannuel de l'agence de l'eau, pour le SIADS
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0601JUD003459812
1 juin 2017
7 October 2010 the applicant sent a document to the mayor of the Tomaszów Mazowiecki District ( Starosta Powiatowy - “the district mayor”) entitled “Petition” ( Wniosek - “the document”), which was signed
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0726JUD000450806
26 juillet 2011
In their internal legal orders they may make the rights to vote and to stand for election subject to conditions which are not in principle precluded under Article 3 (see Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0429JUD003631397
29 avril 1998
It originated in an application (no. 36313/97) against the French Republic lodged with the Commission under Article 25 by a French national, Mr Mathieu Henra, on 21 May 1997.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0406JUD004379798
6 avril 2006
On the same day, i.e. 10 June 1992, the prosecutor E.C. signed a warrant authorising the search of the applicant’s flat.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0829JUD004365122
29 août 2023
The Constitutional Court distinguished the case before it from Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium (2 March 1987, Series A no. 113), on the following grounds: “119.
Pôle 4 - Chambre 5
6363685437e31b7f744449d8
2 novembre 2022
Décision déférée à la Cour : Jugement du 26 Février 2019 -Tribunal de commerce de CRETEIL - RG n° 2016F00117 APPELANTE SA ADP INGENIERIE [Adresse 7] [Localité 1] Représentée par Me Matthieu