The Constitutional Court held that it was compatible with the Constitution with regard to periods of time during which the suspension of the evictions was determined by law.

:30.55pt; display:inline-block } .s4DA7B69C { width:222.81pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } .sFDE7661F {

No violation of Art. 6-1 with regard to the non-execution;Inadmissible under Art. 6-1 with regard to the length of the proceedings, and under Art. 13

: hidden;}} .pdfOutput_10 { position: absolute; pointer-events: none; clip: rect(-0.041667em,49.375em,70.04166em,-0.041667em); width: 100%; } .pdfOutput_11 { font-size: 1em; line-height: 0.0em; width:

Violation Art. 3 with regard to 25 applicants;No violation Art. 3 with regard to 6 applicants;No violation Art. 5;No violation Art. 14+5;Violation Art. 14+8

No violation of Art. 6-1 with regard to two sets of proceedings;Violation of Art. 6-1 with regard to one set of proceedings;Non-pecuniary damage - financial award

:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s61ED8A2B { width:14.36pt; display:inline-block } .s61E420C2 { font-family:Arial; font-variant:small-caps } .s84D0D60A { width:8.36pt; display:inline-block } .sBB5E682E

: rect(-0.041667em,33.04167em,48.43164em,-0.041667em); width: 100%; } .pdfOutput_07 { position: absolute; pointer-events: none; clip: rect(-0.041667em,32.92167em,48.46164em,-0.041667em); width: 100%; }

The applicant subsequently reached a settlement with the authorities and the Government purchased a flat for her at a price of 330,000 roubles.

:35.21pt; display:inline-block } .s1F75034F { width:235.81pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block }    

:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s61ED8A2B { width:14.36pt; display:inline-block } .s61E420C2 { font-family:Arial; font-variant:small-caps } .s84D0D60A { width:8.36pt; display:inline-block } .sBB5E682E

(impartial tribunal) – As the Deputy President of the Regional Court who lodged the protest was also a member of the Presidium of the Regional Court which examined the protest, this was incompatible with

:20.81pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s630A7FBD { width:234.82pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s16822176 { width:18.21pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s68AFC921 { width

Violation of Art. 3 with regard to ill-treatment;Violation of Art. 3 with regard to the effective character of the investigation;Non-pecuniary damage - financial award;Costs and expenses - claim dismissed

:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s61ED8A2B { width:14.36pt; display:inline-block } .s61E420C2 { font-family:Arial; font-variant:small-caps } .s84D0D60A { width:8.36pt; display:inline-block } .sBB5E682E

The applicant complied with the requests. 11.

:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s61ED8A2B { width:14.36pt; display:inline-block } .s61E420C2 { font-family:Arial; font-variant:small-caps } .s84D0D60A { width:8.36pt; display:inline-block } .sBB5E682E

:3.85pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s6BF71389 { width:47.38pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s275CCCF2 { width:5.86pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s42F29AAA { width

Further proceedings which they had brought in connection with the destruction of their garage and other buildings in an explosion were similarly stayed in July 2000.

  While Article 6 states a general rule that civil proceedings, inter alia, should take place in public, it is not inconsistent with that provision to designate an entire class of case as an exception