Diana Sârcu,   Mykola Gnatovskyy , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application against Ukraine lodged with the   Court under Article

d'extradition suivie contre lui à la requête du gouvernement marocain, a rejeté sa demande de mise en liberté ; Vu le mémoire produit ; Sur le premier moyen de cassation, pris de la violation des articles

    The case originated in an application (no. 3547/06) against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 34 OF THE CONVENTION 45.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 34 OF THE CONVENTION 48.     The applicant complained that the conditions in the meeting room of Tbilisi Prison No.

    Facts concerning the State’s alleged non-compliance with Article   34 of the Convention 32.

    ALLEGED NON-COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE 34 OF THE CONVENTION 65.

    The case originated in an application (no. 26581/06) against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (

    The case originated in applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention

Révision rejetée (Article 34 - Victime)

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 34 OF THE CONVENTION 79.

    The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention

    The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention

permettre à la Cour d’examiner sa requête de manière adéquate et efficace ou n’aient pas rempli leur obligation de ne pas entraver l’exercice effectif du droit de recours individuel (violation de l’article

Cairat,   Vasilka Sancin , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application against the Republic of Azerbaijan lodged with the Court under Article

  28322/20) against the Republic of Serbia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Serbian national

Se prévalant des dispositions de l'article 34 de la loi n° 65-557 du 10 juillet 1965, ils ont, devant la cour d'appel, demandé que ces résolutions leur soient déclarées inopposables en raison du caractère

    The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention

,   Hugh Mercer , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application against the Republic of North Macedonia lodged with the Court under Article