A.Z. stated that some days prior to the murder he had seen the applicant arguing with his wife near his house.

et 7 juin 1996 au secrétariat du Contentieux du Conseil d'Etat, présentés pour l'ASSOCIATON DE DEFENSE DE L'ENVIRONNEMENT ET DU CADRE DE VIE dont le siège est ..., l'ASSOCIATION MANDELIEU-LA-NAPOULE D'HIER

A surety required the separate approval of the court as to his suitability.

to help him prepare his appeal against conviction.

LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par l'association Vers la vie pour l'éducation des jeunes, dont le siège social est sis à Yerres (Essonne), Le

Thus, the initial interference with G.’s right to respect for his private life had stemmed from the applicant’s decision to publish that information on his website and, above all, to keep it available

In respect of his first detention in Prison no. 13, the applicant submitted that an important aspect had been his frequent transfer from one cell to another, which, in his view, amounted of itself to inhuman

by the Government did not apply to his individual situation.

whether or not the tumour to his hand required treatment.

school teacher had sent him out of his classroom; and that due to his Kurdish origin he was refused employment.

His request was refused on the same day. 16.

   The applicant has filed the application in his own as well as in his daughter's name.

The school had failed to offer adequate first aid to his son.

Before his departure, on 3 February 1997, he had been paid his pension for six months in advance (1 March – 31 August 1997), and the pension then stopped, as provided for in section 92 of the Law of Ukraine

2012 violated his right to liberty.

The applicant was involved in a boundary dispute with his neighbours.

    The application concerns the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment by police officers, the lack of an effective investigation into his complaint and the use of his confession statements at his

In his opinion the decision of his dismissal on account of his alleged participation in the Referendum violated his right to freedom of expression.

At his trial, the Crown case comprised his confession evidence, the evidence of Mrs Dunne and the evidence of Mrs A.

As a basis for the calculation of his pension (in respect of his average remuneration over the final five years of his working life), the INPS employed a theoretical level of remuneration (“ retribuzione