CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

7 335 résultats pour « Louste »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520DEC003133416

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2021

20 mai 2021

The Government pleaded that the applicants had lost their victim status due to the fact that they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law   no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408DEC000112715

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2021

8 avril 2021

The Government argued mainly that the applicants had lost their victim status because they had benefited from the remedy offered by Law   no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0218DEC005041515

Admin. suprême

18 février 2021

18 février 2021

The Government pleaded mainly that the applicants had lost their victim status because they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1124DEC000556217

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2022

24 novembre 2022

  The Government argued mainly that the applicants had lost their victim status because they had benefited from the remedy offered by Law no.   169/2017 amending and completing Law no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-225269

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2023

17 mai 2023

G. sued the applicant company for failure to deliver in time, asking for damages caused by compensation it had paid to S. for late delivery and for lost profit.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCREFERRALS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1656620-1735874

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2006

25 avril 2006

February 2000 the High Court held that, since the Grahams enjoyed factual possession of the land from January 1984 and adverse possession took effect from September 1984, the applicant companies had lost

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1217DEC006285715

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2020

17 décembre 2020

The Government pleaded that the applicants had lost their victim status due to the fact that they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law   no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1124DEC001701908

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2009

24 novembre 2009

Furthermore it ordered the applicant to bear one third of the costs of the proceedings given that he had lost his case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13832

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2022

13 octobre 2022

As he had been a minor at the time of independence, he had lost his French nationality because his father had not signed a declaration of recognition of French nationality.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0831DEC003860915

Admin. suprême

31 août 2023

31 août 2023

The Government argued mainly that the applicants had lost their victim status because they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1124DEC004199716

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2022

24 novembre 2022

The Government argued mainly that the applicants had lost their victim status because they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law   no.   169/2017 amending and completing Law no.

Source officielle
CA

Chambre commerciale

6549e309bc1a528318e09727

Appel

2 novembre 2023

2 novembre 2023

TIRIAULT, représentée par son gérant en exercice Siège social : [Adresse 1] - [Localité 5] Représentée par Me Séverine LOSTE, membre de la SELARL SOCIETE D'AVOCATS JURISCAL, avocat au barreau de NOUMEA

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-116627

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2013

17 janvier 2013

situation pertaining before the violation of the right and the cessation of the actions violating the author’s rights or may lead to such a violation; (c)     compensation for the losses or lost

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0617DEC003494115

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2021

17 juin 2021

The Government argued that the applicants had lost their victim status because that they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0709DEC000286316

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2020

9 juillet 2020

The Government pleaded that the applicants had lost their victim status due to the fact that they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law   no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-116626

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2013

17 janvier 2013

As a consequence, all access to their land was blocked and the harvest was lost, whereas some of the agricultural machines of those who tried to work their land were seized.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-228242

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2023

18 septembre 2023

They submitted that they had lost their title to the house because of mistakes made by the authorities and that they themselves had not in any way contributed to the unlawfulness of the construction.

Source officielle
CA

Cour d'Appel

6253cc06bd3db21cbdd8ee23

Appel

13 décembre 2011

13 décembre 2011

APPELANTS -Monsieur Jean-Maurice X... ... 13008 MARSEILLE -SARL TMR FRANCE EUROPE prise en la personne de son représentant légal 349, avenue du Prado 13008 MARSEILLE représentés Me Christian LOUIT

Source officielle
CA

CHAMBRE ÉCONOMIQUE

68676bcefdaf41a8356be5c4

Appel

3 juillet 2025

3 juillet 2025

Migjen CEKAJ de l'AARPI BDF AVOCATS, avocat au barreau de NANCY ET : INTIMES Monsieur [O] [Z] [Adresse 6] [Localité 2] Représenté par Me Jean-Michel LECLERCQ-LEROY de la SELARL LOUETTE-LECLERCQ

Source officielle
CE

6ème chambre jugeant seule

ECLI:FR:CECHS:2021:438886.20211229

Admin. suprême

29 décembre 2021

29 décembre 2021

lequel le préfet de Maine-et-Loire a autorisé la société Travaux publics des Pays-de-la-Loire (TPPL) à exploiter une carrière et ses installations connexes sur le territoire de la commune de Mozé-sur-Louet

Source officielle

Page 30 sur 367

← PrécédentSuivant →