The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about a violation of their right to a hearing by an “independent and impartial tribunal established by law,” since their civil or criminal

  1 taken alone and in conjunction with Article   14 of the Convention. Conclusion : no violation (four votes to three).

COMPLAINT The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the length of the proceedings in his action had been excessive.

    The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention

de l’article 8 de la Convention?

3 and/or Article 8 of the Convention?

  The applicant further complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the various refusals of the public prosecutor to institute criminal proceedings against various persons.

Mr Gorlov also complains under Article 1 of Protocol   No. 1 to the Convention that a failure by the State to assist him in the enforcement of the judgment resulted in a violation of his property

  Il dénonçait une violation de l’article 6 § 1 (délai raisonnable) de la Convention et de l’article 1 du Protocole n° 1 (protection de la propriété) quant à son licenciement et à la déchéance de

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.

    Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their home and private and family life in the present case, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?   2.

He further complained, invoking Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, about the length of his pre-trial detention.

Lastly, relying on Article 6 and Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 the applicant complains about his conviction for various terrorism-related crimes as unfair and unjustified.

    The Court first must determine whether the applicant has complied with Article 35 of the Convention, and specifically with the six months time-limit established by Article 35 § 1 of the Convention

The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Austrian Government (“the Government”).

In addition, the applicants complain under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about unreasonable length of civil proceedings in their cases, and under Article 13 of the Convention, that they did not have

  Do the injuries of the applicants constitute a violation of Article   2 of the Convention?

COMPLAINTS The applicant complains under Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention of a breach of his right to respect for his family life because of the dismissal of his Hague Convention application and various

These sums will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights.