CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
COUR ADMINISTRATIVE D'APPEL DE LYON
ORCA_22LY01014_20221031
31 octobre 2022
B, représenté par Me Bechaux, demande à la cour : 1°) d'annuler le jugement du magistrat désigné par la présidente du tribunal administratif de Lyon du 18 novembre 2021 ; 2°) d'annuler les décisions
Page 31 sur 521
Tribunal Administratif de Lyon
ORTA_2410045_20250403
3 avril 2025
A B, représenté par Me Béchaux, demande au tribunal : 1°) de l'admettre au bénéfice de l'aide juridictionnelle provisoire ; 2°) d'enjoindre à la préfète du Rhône d'assurer son hébergement conformément
ELOIGNEMENT
DTA_2300278_20230120
20 janvier 2023
B D, représenté par Me Béchaux, demande au tribunal : 1°) de l'admettre provisoirement à l'aide juridictionnelle ; 2°) d'annuler les décisions du 12 janvier 2023 par lesquelles le préfet du Rhône lui
DTA_2300280_20230117
17 janvier 2023
A D, représenté par Me Béchaux, demande au tribunal : 1°) de l'admettre provisoirement à l'aide juridictionnelle ; 2°) d'annuler les décisions du 12 janvier 2023 par lesquelles le préfet du Rhône lui
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1016DEC002337194
16 octobre 1996
G. to act on his behalf in the specific case.
CJUE
ECLI:EU:C:1994:116
24 mars 1994
#Tillægsafgift på mælk - forpagtningsaftalens udløb - overførsel af referencemængden til bortforpagteren - ingen pligt til at betale erstatning til den afgående forpagter.#Sag C-2/92.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0824DEC005269099
24 août 2004
The applicant complained about his lawyer’s failure to lodge a cassation appeal on his behalf to the Regional Bar Council ( Okręgowa Rada Adwokacka ).
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-141032
20 novembre 2013
While the first issue addressed (the prosecutor’s power to act on behalf of the State) seemed more suitably resolved by means of amending the law, the second issue (respect of the legal time-limit) was
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-141011
TRIBUNAL_UE
ECLI:EU:T:2009:90
31 mars 2009
#ArcelorMittal Luxembourg SA, ArcelorMittal Belval & Differdange SA en ArcelorMittal International SA tegen Commissie van de Europese Gemeenschappen.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0412DEC002396994
12 avril 1996
He also requested, if the appellate court so agreed, that the evidence of a witness on his behalf, namely his employer at the time of the rape, be heard to have further details about his duties as the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0309DEC003657097
9 mars 1999
The court found that the authority acting on behalf of the latter was the Ministry of Health and Social Affairs since the alleged erroneous acts were related to public health care.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1970:0401DEC000444570
1 avril 1970
He explains that the Regional Court deliberately failed to hear certain witnesses on his behalf whom he had nominated.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0302DEC004993599
2 mars 2006
Pursuant to the Convention, the Receiving Agencies of maintenance claims designated by the Contracting Parties shall take on behalf of the claimant all appropriate steps fort he recovery of maintenance
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0902DEC002134593
2 septembre 1994
Y. and to the statements of several witnesses, including Y. and witnesses on behalf of the applicant.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0924JUD003052696
24 septembre 2002
On 5 December 1995 the first applicant died and the application was pursued on his behalf by his two legal successors. 2. The applicants were represented by Mr H.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113594
10 septembre 2012
On 30 January 2007 the applicant, in his name and on behalf of his company, made a request for the release of the property.
ECLI:CEDH:001-192360
15 mars 2019
The first applicant lodged the application on her own behalf and on behalf of her daughter, who is a minor. They are represented before the Court by Mr Y. Georgiades, a lawyer practising in Cyprus.
ECLI:CEDH:001-81574
20 juin 2007
Proceedings were brought against the police under the section 7 (1) of the Human Rights Act 1998 by the parents of the deceased as Claimants on their own behalf alleging that Article 2 and Article
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0129DEC008054312
29 janvier 2019
His wife, Ms Marinela Codrean, made a request to pursue the application on his behalf. They were represented before the Court by Mr A. Koloszi, a lawyer practising in Oradea. 2.