If the claim is rejected in whole or in part or if no reply is received within sixty days, the victim may bring administrative proceedings.

He submitted that, having refused treatment on 14 September 2001, he was transferred to a dark, cold and humid solitary cell with no furniture for a few days.

Dary, Mme Thomas, M. Laurent, conseillers de la chambre, Mme Barbé, M. Violeau, M. Mallard, Mme Guerrini, M. Michon, conseillers référendaires, M. Desportes, premier avocat général, et M.

Dary, Mme Thomas, M. Laurent, conseillers de la chambre, Mme Barbé, M. Violeau, M. Mallard, Mme Guerrini, M. Michon, conseillers référendaires, M. Desportes, premier avocat général, et M.

He was therefore released on the same day, after approximately seven months of detention in prison no. 13.

During the day he was driven to Comrat Police Station. 8.     On 3   June 2002 the Comrat District Court issued an order remanding the applicant in custody for a period of thirty days.

  During his third day of captivity, the applicant alleged that he was taken from his cell to another room with an iron chair.

had been scheduled for that same day and an interview date had been set for 20/05/2020;   (iii) on 25/11/2019 the public prosecutor for minors had contacted N.N.’s representatives to establish his

16°/ Mme Bernadette L..., agissant en qualité d'ayant droit de Yannick L..., décédé, domiciliée [...] , 17°/ Mme Barbara M..., domiciliée [...] , 18°/ Mme Maryse N..., domiciliée [...] , 19°/ Mme Dany

siège du tribunal judiciaire de Meaux Nous, Marie-Sygne Bunot-Rouillard, conseillère à la cour d'appel de Paris, agissant par délégation du premier président de cette cour, assistée de Alexandre Darj

an unspecified number of days later – see below for details).

  The applicant owns a cubicle cowshed containing 90 cubicles for dairy cows and 63 cubicles for calves.

    The first day 14.     The house was surrounded by the police.

The applicant was indicted for abuse of office and giving bribes ( dare de mită ). 12.

Such reference is erroneous since no claim had been lodged at the time when the ruling was delivered.

  The applicants’ claim and the Government’s comment on it 2.   The Court’s assessment B.   Non-pecuniary damage C.   Costs and expenses 1.   The applicants’ claims 2.

    The applicant maintained his claim. 58.

Wabl's victim also intends to claim compensation for moral damages.

  Wabl's victim also intends to claim compensation for moral damages.