Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-427918-428397
9 octobre 2001
9 octobre 2001
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded the applicant 40,000 French francs for non-pecuniary damage (The judgment is available only in French.)
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68170-68638
17 mai 2001
17 mai 2001
The hearing is being held both on the admissibility and merits of the case.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-120084
2 mai 2013
2 mai 2013
He subsequently left the country with the help of a fellow clan member. The applicant’s asylum request was refused.
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1891560-1986547
11 janvier 2007
11 janvier 2007
On 28 July 1998 Alūksne District Court held that Mrs Sisojeva was entitled to apply for a passport as a “permanently resident non-citizen” and that Mr Sisojev and Aksana Sisojeva were entitled to permanent
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-861855-884089
23 octobre 2003
23 octobre 2003
At the time the application was lodged, he was being held in Bursa Prison.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1913225-2019880
8 février 2007
8 février 2007
Lastly, the Court held unanimously that there had not been a breach of Article 8 regarding the allegation relating to the applicant’s right to respect for his family life.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1941989-2048652
8 mars 2007
8 mars 2007
It also held that the length of the proceedings against him, namely seven years and nine months, had been excessive and entailed a violation of Article 6 § 1.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1912635-2016692
6 février 2007
6 février 2007
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 3 on account of the excessive length of the applicant’s pre-trial detention.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1954972-2068847
27 mars 2007
27 mars 2007
It held unanimously that there had been a breach of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 with regard to the flat in Beyoğlu.
Source officielle3ème chambre
63be640c13ef607c90ab6841
10 janvier 2023
10 janvier 2023
[K] [P] épouse [O] [M] [W] [Y] [O] [G] [E] [P] [I] [Z] [J] [A] épouse [P] [U] [O] [C] [O] CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE [Localité 16] CPAM DU TARN OFFICE NATIONAL DES FORETS SA ALLIANZ IARD SAS HELI
Source officielle1ère CHAMBRE CIVILE
63c79b08da31367c908eb537
17 janvier 2023
17 janvier 2023
[A] [S] et la société HELI-[Localité 29] ont attrait en intervention forcée la compagnie d'assurances AVIABEL en sa qualité d'assureur de la société HELI-[Localité 29] aux fins de garantie de toutes condamnations
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2077239-2204146
27 juillet 2007
27 juillet 2007
The first four applicants were members of a motor cycle club called “ Screwdrivers ”, which was based in Hamar (Norway) and was, at the relevant time, a hang-out for the Hells Angels.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68408-68876
6 février 2001
6 février 2001
Estonia, the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights. 1.
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2176193-2313650
13 novembre 2007
13 novembre 2007
The Court held, by 13 votes to four, that there had been a violation of Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) of the European convention on human rights read in conjunction with Article
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1238279-1289141
13 janvier 2005
13 janvier 2005
The Court held unanimously that: There had been a violation of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (right to life) on account of the death of Kadri Demir; There had been
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1747706-1832862
8 août 2006
8 août 2006
Accordingly, the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 3.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1905426-2010503
30 janvier 2007
30 janvier 2007
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Articles 5 § 3 and 6 § 1.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-671175-678335
19 décembre 2002
19 décembre 2002
The first hearing in the case was held on 17 November 1997.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-698236-706373
11 février 2003
11 février 2003
Accordingly, the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 on both counts.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1936344-2042793
1 mars 2007
1 mars 2007
Consequently, the Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 2.
Source officiellePage 31 sur 2440