CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1022DEC000025010
22 octobre 2019
inserted incorrect data into the file. 13.
Page 31 sur 277
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1116DEC005803900
16 novembre 2004
La plainte déposée par la requérante fit l'objet d'un classement sans suite le 20 février 2002. f.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1117DEC006036911
17 novembre 2015
be kept strictly secret in accordance with a statute or due to their essence, the competent supreme supervisory authority may refuse the submission of certificates or files, the transmission of the electronic
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020DEC000972805
20 octobre 2015
Bakiyev is not given an opportunity to send File No. 9728/05 from the detention facility. We request that you demand the file at the address: [the detention facility’s address].” 20.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0407DEC001603690
7 avril 1994
In such a case the violation of the interests of landscape protection must be kept to a minimum by imposing conditions."
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1202DEC002065792
2 décembre 1992
In the course of the trial the prosecution applied for a direction that professional cameramen, journalists and photographers employed by television companies and newspapers who had taken films
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115246
12 novembre 2012
On 27 April 2009 the court refused the request noting the case file did not contain any medical evidence suggesting that the applicant could not be kept in custody. 7 August 2009 the applicant was dismissed
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0507DEC004003420
7 mai 2025
It appears from the case file that he informed the children of that fact and subsequently refused to see them. 3 .
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0227JUD006071610
27 février 2025
The Government argued that they had no access to the case file, which was located within the territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, outside their area of control.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0402JUD000144115
2 avril 2026
However, there is nothing in the file to confirm that the applicant company was sent a copy of G.’s reasoned appeal.
4ème chambre
DCA_22PA01118_20240329
29 mars 2024
Un mémoire présenté pour la société Keller fondations spéciales a été enregistré le 19 janvier 2024.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0707JUD006213015
7 juillet 2020
En 2002, un fils naquit de cette union.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0904DEC000342409
4 septembre 2012
On 26 September 1999, at around 5 p.m., the applicant’s brother, B.D., died as a result of falling from the roof of a building, allegedly while trying to pick a fig from a tree. 4.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0313DEC002386423
13 mars 2025
Sous l’angle procédural, elle dénonce les carences de l’enquête initiale, tout comme les insuffisances de l’instruction pour déterminer les circonstances de la mort de son fils. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214DEC000455015
14 décembre 2021
Article 100 [the right to consult court files] shall not apply to the files ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0608DEC005938518
8 juin 2023
The Government also submitted that the case file had clearly shown that the accusation against the applicant had included his behaviour at the police station.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0606DEC003721819
6 juin 2024
Il rejeta la demande du requérant aux fins de nouvelle expertise psychologique ou psychiatrique de K.R. et des enfants, en vue de se prononcer sur l’existence d’une emprise de la mère sur ses filles au
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0630JUD003277202
30 juin 2009
Kessler et M. Schürmann en leurs déclarations ainsi qu’en leurs réponses aux questions de la Cour. EN FAIT I. LES CIRCONSTANCES DE L’ESPÈCE A.
Cour d'Appel
6253c9e0bd3db21cbdd896c8
13 septembre 2007
Thierry DE X... ... 75015 PARIS comparant en personne, assisté de Me Cosme GUEZO, avocat au barreau de PARIS, D1606 INTIMÉE ASSOCIATION DE GESTION AGRÉÉE DES PROFESSIONS DE SANTÉ 3, rue Kepler
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2703
24 mai 2007
In those circumstances, the Court considered that the national authorities had not taken sufficient care of the applicant’s health, except during the time he had been kept in hospital.