the meaning of the Court’s case-law.

The court found that, as there had been no amendment to the criminal legislation, the principle of non-retrospective effect did not apply to a mere case-law interpretation, and that the impugned customs

    Repetitive cases   The following cases raise issues which have already been submitted to the Court.

On 16 November 1999 the Presidium of the Moscow Regional Court quashed the decision of 9 April 1999 on a technicality and remitted the case to the cassation instance for re-examination.

On 14 September 2009 the case was referred to the Grand Chamber at the Government’s request.

LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par Mme Monique A... épouse B..., demeurant à Rosny-sous-Bois (Seine-Saint-Denis), ..., en cassation d'un arrêt

    Scope of the case before the Court 24.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

    The Supreme Court ( Högsta domstolen ) later granted the re-opening of the case.

    In the present case, the Court observes that the mere fact that the authorities complied with the judgments after a substantial delay cannot be viewed as automatically depriving the applicant

On 17 December 2019 the Chamber to which the case had been allocated relinquished jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber.

    Scope of the case before the Court 22.

représenté par la SCP BOYER-LESCAT-MERLE C/ SELARL Christophe Y...

In the case of Karslı and Others v.

In the eyes of the Court, such statements do not constitute a mere “negative assessment of the applicant's case” but amount to adopting a definite position on the outcome of the case, with a clear preference

The present case was fundamentally different from the Ždanoka case . Unlike in that case, it was not sufficient here simply to find that the person belonged to the group concerned.

It was contended that, in any case, the former Finnish Savings Bank had not transferred its claims to the Arsenal-SSP in the merger and had not issued a valid decision to institute the proceedings for

  Having regard to this decision, the County Administrative Court, on 23 August 1993, struck the case concerning termination of care off its list of cases.   COMPLAINTS   1.

In the present case, the authorities’ sporadic measures had not been an integral part of any therapeutic care or treatment path.