The Court notes that Mr Purice eventually received MDL   15,799.35 out of a total MDL 19,986 established in the seven awards in his favour.

The applicant complained about the continued non-enforcement of the judgment in his favour and its subsequent quashing by way of supervisory review. 4.

    They obtained final court judgments in their favour imposing obligations to provide them with housing.

#Sexta Directiva IVA - Artículo 13, parte A, apartado 1, letra d) - Exenciones en favor de actividades de interés general - Entregas de órganos, sangre, leche y otros elementos del cuerpo humano - Actividad

#Segurança social dos trabalhadores migrantes - Artigo 42.º CE - Regulamento (CEE) n.º 1408/71 - Artigo 58.º - Subsídio a favor dos trabalhadores expostos ao amianto - Cálculo das prestações pecuniárias

    Judgments in the applicants’ favour and the debtor company’s insolvency 4.

    As regards application no. 56692/11 In 2003, in a reinstatement and personal injury case, the competent court ruled partly in favour of Mr H.

#Recursos de decisão do Tribunal Geral — Auxílios de Estado — Medidas financeiras a favor da France Télécom — Projeto de adiantamento de acionista — Declarações públicas de um membro do Governo francês

COMPLAINT The applicant complains under Article 6 of the Convention about the respondent State’s failure to enforce final court judgment rendered on 19   June 2003 in his favour.

COMPLAINT The applicant complained about the non-enforcement of the judicial decision in his favour and about the lack of an effective remedy in that respect. THE LAW A.

On 3 September and 29 October 2002 the applicant requested the enforcement of the judgment in his favour. However, it has never been enforced.

GRENOBLE Frais de Greffe compris dans les dépens (Art. 701 du CPC) : 146,94 € HT, 29,39 € TVA, 176,33 € TTC DÉFENDEUR À L'INJONCTION DE PAYER - non comparant Copie exécutoire envoyée le 10/01/2025 à Me FAVET

On 3   May   2001, the Novogrodovsky City Court found in favour of the applicant and awarded him 4,369.73 UAH in salary arrears and compensation.

On 5 December 2011 the Administrative Court found in favour of the applicant and cancelled the bailiff’s decision of 18 July 2011.

  The applicant reiterated that the State was responsible for the delay in the enforcement of the court judgment in her favour. 16.

The judgments in the applicants’ favour became final but the authorities delayed their enforcement.

The applicants complained under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the prolonged non-enforcement of the domestic judgments given in their favour.

On 10 April 2002 the Kirovskiy District Court of Yekaterinburg ruled in favour of the applicant association and ordered re ­ registration by the Justice Department. 6.

Those decisions in the applicants’ favour became final and enforceable, but the State delayed their enforcement.