He also submitted that his family situation was alarming due to the fact that his father-in-law had died, that his stepdaughter had had a miscarriage, that his wife and three children had critical financial

force after he had committed his offence.

his sustained and supportive parental relationships; his wish to improve himself; and the absence of substance misuse.

his own choosing. .. 7.

Si elle ne pouvait pas s'y rendre un éducateur du groupe devra se rendre au tribunal d'Aix.

As a result, the applicant lost his business.

harm to his human dignity."

Noting that the applicant had not been deprived of his right to hunt, the Board also expressed the view that the limitation that had been imposed upon his right to control fully the use of his property

He had borne traces of the alleged violence – a haematoma on his side and abrasions on his arm and legs.

Since the amount of his remuneration will be affected by his patient numbers, suspension may well affect the economic value to him of his practice.

return for his confession and for “falsely incriminating him”, reprieved from being sentenced himself; and (ii) the drugs found in possession of the said co-defendant, not the applicant personally.

The prosecutor dismissed his request replying that the (one month) time-limit expired because the judgment was registered later than two months after its delivery.

LE PREFET DU NORD ; Vu l’ordonnance de maintien en rétention rendue par le juge des libertés et de la détention du tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 08/05/2025 ; Vu l’ordonnance de prorogation rendue

heures les occupants des résidences mobiles stationnées sur le terrain de l'aérodrome du Bournet situé à Saint-Just-Luzac mais appartenant à la commune de Marennes-Hiers-Brouage.

The applicant reiterated his account of events.

his appeal on points of law.

health condition influenced by his mental illness, to express his qualified consent to his admission to [the hospital] which appears to be necessary to protect his life and health.

family life with his spouse and their child.

He repeated his allegations against them.

with his correspondence, were dismissed.