CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1016JUD002762306
16 octobre 2014
    By letter of 23 May 2012, the Registry informed the applicant that his complaint had been more than ten pages long and, referring to the provisions of the Rules of Court and the Practice
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0925JUD001718515
25 septembre 2025
:0pt; margin-left:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s2044A09A { margin-left:6.51pt; margin-bottom:6pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.99pt; font-weight:normal; font-style:italic
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0905DEC004259098
5 septembre 2002
Il soutient par ailleurs que l’ingérence en question était nécessaire dans une société démocratique, dans la mesure où l’information litigieuse publiée dans le journal ne représenterait pas une simple
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0112JUD007967113
12 janvier 2021
14pt; margin-left:28.6pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:0.6pt; font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s743F3A55 { margin-right:0pt; margin-left:0pt;
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0802JUD003738797
2 août 2000
Par lettre du 10 mars 1994, le secrétaire général du Conseil d'Etat informa le requérant que l'instruction de son dossier était achevée et qu'un rapporteur avait été désigné.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1205JUD002849395
5 décembre 2002
:10pt } .s70EB9942 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:20.15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:8.8pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s160BBE39 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:20.15pt; margin-bottom
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115023
7 novembre 2012
The doctor informed her that there was nothing wrong with the applicant and that he had simply examined his pancreas. No other explanation was given. 3.
ECLI:CEDH:001-126661
6 septembre 2013
After examining his identity card and running his information in the police database, the police let the applicant go.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1221JUD005600700
21 décembre 2004
:36.6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:-15.05pt; page-break-after:avoid } .s13F94BDE { font-family:Arial; letter-spacing:-0.1pt } .sDDEC8B1D { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:24pt;
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0722JUD001460716
22 juillet 2021
:0pt } .s29A3AC47 { margin-left:11.67pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:6.18pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s3A692EA6 { margin-top:
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1028DEC004586099
28 octobre 1999
:-0.1pt } .sC83B07C { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s908FE487 { width:3.32pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0914DEC003770397
14 septembre 2000
:-0.1pt } .s556ED54D { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.1pt } .s4D28B2E2 { width:24pt; display:inline-block } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s81D7C79 { margin-left:15.01pt
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0601JUD002297805
1 juin 2010
:italic; letter-spacing:-0.1pt } .s9C91EB7E { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-style:italic; letter-spacing:-0.1pt; vertical-align:super } .s450434BC { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:59.5pt; margin-bottom
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1014JUD003630803
14 octobre 2008
; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sAB173E38 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .s127C7598 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1027JUD000307918
27 octobre 2022
:0pt } .s29A3AC47 { margin-left:11.67pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:6.18pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s9D48DD53 { margin-top:
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0530JUD005189599
30 mai 2006
In that letter the registry informed the applicant that his defence counsel had been asked to provide more detailed information of his trial.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0521DEC001584007
21 mai 2013
:10pt } .sFD4D42B6 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s984A15CA { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt;
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0330JUD004668207
30 mars 2010
:justify } .sD66C1369 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17.3pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s147A4AAD { width:18pt; display:inline-block } .s81CCF55C { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1025JUD004187998
25 octobre 2001
:18pt; margin-left:20.15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-20.15pt } .sE8EB5753 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s6BBACBD8 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:20.15pt; margin-bottom
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1202JUD001862003
2 décembre 2008
:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .s127C7598 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .sD66C1369 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17.3pt;
Page 32 sur 1109