CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0719JUD004208602
19 juillet 2007
The Court notes that it has already examined the same grievance in the past and has found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, in particular, Göç , cited above, § 55; Sağır
Page 33 sur 361
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1214JUD003148902
14 décembre 2006
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 6 § 1 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION 55. The applicant complained about the excessive length of the proceedings.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0928DEC004141111
28 septembre 2021
Article 102 provides that court fees consist of stamp duty ( taksa mbi aktet ) and other legal costs and expenses.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0609JUD000958081
9 juin 1988
The applicant claimed under this provision compensation for damage and reimbursement of costs and expenses incurred in the proceedings before the Convention institutions. A. Costs and expenses 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0515JUD006252615
15 mai 2018
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 60.
Pôle 1 - Chambre 5
644229f2d2fa6fd0f80404c8
20 avril 2023
MOTIFS En vertu de l'article 55, II, du décret n° 2019-1333 du 11 décembre 2019, les nouvelles dispositions relatives à l'exécution provisoire s'appliquent aux instances introduites devant les juridictions
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1122JUD002224602
22 novembre 2005
There has, accordingly, been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. IV. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 21.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0207JUD004429598
7 février 2006
to him under Article 105 of the Code of Obligations.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0207JUD007453201
available to her under Article 105 of the Code of Obligations.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1221JUD004811499
21 décembre 2004
33082/96, § 65, 21 September 2000). 55.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0409JUD003893797
9 avril 2002
Consequently, there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. II. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 39.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0310JUD001925502
10 mars 2009
He relied on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. 12.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0506JUD004191604
6 mai 2010
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 58.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0630JUD004186218
30 juin 2020
costs.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0510DEC001739508
10 mai 2011
They further requested the Court to strike out the application in accordance with Article 37 of the Convention.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0909DEC002026618
9 septembre 2021
Il a en outre invité la Cour à rayer la requête du rôle conformément à l’article 37 de la Convention.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4802
8 juillet 2003
Article 14 in conjunction with Article 8 – The facts fell within the scope of Article 8 and Article 14 was therefore applicable.
ECLI:CEDH:002-4805
Article 14 in conjunction with Article 8 – (a) The Court adopted the same general approach as in Sahin , above.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0730JUD003976005
30 juillet 2009
of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113151
29 août 2012
Before their privatisation, the Banco di Napoli and the Banco di Sicilia were subject to exclusive welfare systems according to Articles 11 and 39 of Law no. 486 of 1985.