CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0125JUD002990716
25 janvier 2022
On 23 October 2009 the applicants lodged a civil discrimination claim against the Republic of Serbia.
Page 33 sur 113
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2015:C101287
18 novembre 2015
cette succession ni aucun partage ; que comme l'a dit jugement le tribunal, le fait d'avoir participé à une procédure relative à la succession de leur grand-père en 1976 constitue un acte manifestant clairement
soc
61372483cd58014677416210
2 février 2006
Estebon Plasencia, demeurant 6, rue des Aliziés, 25250 Blussans, 41 / Mme Gilberte Pourron, demeurant 3, rue des Vergers, 25260 Colombier-Fontaine, 42 / Mme Marie-Claire Puget, demeurant 15, rue
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0131JUD005043599
31 janvier 2006
The Government submitted that they had no observations to make in relation to this claim. 51. The Court finds the claim reasonable, and consequently allows it in full. C.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510JUD004294998
10 mai 2007
In the present cases, since under national law at the relevant time a widow was not automatically paid the benefit, but had to claim it and to wait for the Benefits Agency to process her claim, the Court
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1211JUD000468303
11 décembre 2007
Article 396 § 1 (f) required the appellant to mention in his or her cassation claim those facts which supported the alleged breaches of procedural law if the cassation claim was calling into question the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0902JUD002558794
2 septembre 1997
Non-pecuniary damage: claim allowed in part (De Santa, Abenavoli and Nicodemo). 3. Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage: claim allowed in part (Lapalorcia). B.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0204JUD001381306
4 février 2020
If the principal debtor refuses to satisfy the claim or no reply is received within a reasonable time, the claim may be brought against the person vicariously liable. Compensation Act 17.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0326DEC004597917
26 mars 2024
Specifically, the applicants claim that under the relevant legislation the amount of money in the form of social benefits which they are eligible to receive for the care of the children is lower than the
cr
6079a8d99ba5988459c4f1a7
11 février 2003
Desportes, Ponsot, Valat, Mme Ménotti conseillers référendaires ; Avocat général : Mme Commaret ; Greffier de chambre : Mme Krawiec ; Sur le rapport de Mme le conseiller MAZARS, les observations
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212DEC005461216
12 décembre 2017
Elle considéra que le requérant n’avait pas été en mesure de revenir, de manière claire et circonstanciée, sur les recherches actuellement menées à son encontre, qu’il n’avait pu clairement identifier
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0412DEC002517094
12 avril 1996
They further complain that they were discriminated against compared with accountants who could found companies limited by shares for exercising their profession and rely on Article 14 of the
civ3
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2020:C310453
12 novembre 2020
R... soit sur le plan devant la façade faisant face au ruisseau des Comballes et dans l'acte notarié de 1992, il est indiqué que ce tracé doit être recherché au Nord-Ouest, soit sur le plan devant la façade
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0927DEC004086298
27 septembre 2001
On 20 September 1993 the applicant made further claims, as he considered that the sums paid by the Federal Labour Ministry between 1 January 1991 and 31 May 1993 were significantly less than the
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2419071-2622524
17 juillet 2008
His claim was refused by the Home Secretary on 30 October 2002.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0405DEC002334694
5 avril 1995
The first applicant claims that the courts' decisions not to appoint as her public counsel a lawyer of her own choosing violated Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0402JUD005499110
2 avril 2020
had become final in respect of the rejected part of the applicants’ claim.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0707DEC003959004
7 juillet 2009
By a judgment of 27 January 2003 the District Court dismissed that claim.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0412JUD004135498
12 avril 2001
The Government made no comments on the applicant’s claim. 31.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1221JUD001288919
21 décembre 2021
On 19 December 2017 the County Court dismissed the applicant’s claim.