On 17 March 1989 the Criminal Court gave its decision in which it convicted the applicant, inter alia, of embezzlement and forging documents, and sentenced him to 16 months

    On 9 June 2010, the Diyarbakır public prosecutor filed a bill of indictment with the Diyarbakır Assize Court in respect of the applicant and charged him with forming or leading a terrorist

He was sentenced to death, but the Court of Cassation set aside the judgment – since the operative part did not mention any proof forming the basis of the conviction – and remitted the case to the State

expelled and banned from entering the country on account of her separatist activities against the national security, namely statements she had made about Turks assimilating Kurds and Armenians, and Turks forcing

He was taken to the Chervonozavodskyy District Police Department of Kharkiv, where the police officers beat him up, forcing him to confess to the crime.

The District Court had condemned the methods employed by them as being proscribed by the law (using nail guns to block the doors, throwing firecrackers onto the street, forcing Ministry’s employees out

She claimed that, according to the Article 21 of the Family Code, any transfer by one spouse of deed regard real estate, forming part of marital property, was null if concluded without the notarised consent

The Government are invited to comment in particular on whether the applicant’s testimony given on that date was included in the body of evidence forming the basis for his conviction.

  The European Court noted that the founding texts of the applicant political group emphasised the principles of democracy, including political pluralism, universal suffrage and freedom to take part

In the Court’s view, the applicants’ actions had to be considered together as forming part of a strategy in pursuance of their political aims, which in their very essence ran counter to the democratic

Croatia - 45512/11 Judgment 31.8.2021 [Section I] Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Proceedings and penalties forming part of a coherent and proportionate whole to punish

- une attestation de Mme [I] [Y] mère de la salariée qui indique que sa fille s'est plaint des remarques désobligeantes de sa responsable [U], laquelle lui demandait de faire du forcing auprès des clientes

In March 2003 a criminal investigation was opened against him on suspicion of abuse of power and forging official documents.

    On 12 November 1998 the applicant was charged with fraud and forging documents. On 28 April 2000 the Miskolc District Court found him guilty.

In this connection, it noted that the applicants had had at least two remedies available to them to expedite the investigation proceedings forming the subject of their complaint.

  Suspected of forging documents and making criminal use of them, misappropriation and dishonouring cheques, the applicant was questioned by a police superintendent on 26 June 1990.

    Since its founding the applicant organisation had worked to establish transparent and fair rules in the media sector and had been involved in legislative advocacy.

yard of the first applicant’s house and the first applicant was grabbed by the hair, dragged onto the bridge, hit several times by one of the officers, and had her left hand twisted behind her back, forcing

mai 2008 au 28 mai 2008, déficit fonctionnel permanent : 8 %, souffrances endurées : 3,517, préjudice esthétique temporaire et définitif : 1,5 /7, préjudice d'agrément pour la pratique du ski et du footing