She explained that, before his arrest, her brother had lived with her in her apartment, which had been his registered address until his death, and had taken care of her.

He called Mr A.A. from my phone asking him to come in his car ...

The other four charges related, inter alia , to reported incidents of his conflictual behaviour towards his colleagues and to his failure to respect the dress code of the profession and working hours.

As he lacked official documents demonstrating his family tie with the applicant and his spouse, Hannibal was considered to find himself in a situation in which – through no fault of his own – he was hampered

), who noticed abrasions under both of his eyes and two abrasions on his chest. 17 .

; occasion and on his explanations.

The applicant applied to the High Court to have the order set aside on two grounds: first, that the lapse of time since the commission of the alleged offences would render his extradition unjust and oppressive

days later: no violation   Facts : The son of the first two applicants, who was also the brother of the third, died three days after his arrest by two police officers.

He argued that he was entitled to compensation as his acquittal had rendered unlawful the time spent in detention.

The criminal proceedings against the applicant and his alleged ill-treatment 3.

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant’s appeal on points of law and the Constitutional Court dismissed his constitutional appeal for being manifestly ill-founded (I. ÚS 1449/20).

  Nizieński, excluded from dealing with his case on the grounds that there was reasonable doubt as to his impartiality.

It does not consider that his expression in the terms noted above of the “object of his application”, renders his application an abuse of process.

in the immigration office ) who questioned him about his intentions following his release from prison.

paralysis of his lower extremities.

for his private and family life and his right to peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. 35.

Ainsi, elle expose avoir reçu la convocation à l'audience devant le premier juge à 13 heures le jour de cette audience, situation l'empêchant de fait de s'y rendre.

courts decided on the case in his absence.

being pressured by Judge F. and had fears for the outcome of his 2023 criminal case in the event of his pursuing his application before the Court (see paragraph 26 above). 50.

Indeed, Mr McCabe now admits to drinking alcohol prior to his suspension from the pre-release scheme on 30 October 2000, during his subsequent period unlawfully at large, prior to his second suspension