Nor can the term “home” be interpreted as synonymous with the notion of “family roots”, which is a vague and emotive concept (see Demopoulos and Others , Chrysostomi, Lordos and Lordou Anastasiou , Kanari-Eliadou

application inadmissible for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies in the light of the principles affirmed by the Grand Chamber (see Demopoulos and Others , Chrysostomi, Lordos and Lordou Anastasiou , Kanari-Eliadou

Measures depriving a person of his liberty may often involve such an element (see Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, §§ 95-96, ECHR 2008) 29.

Accordingly, many laws are inevitably couched in terms which, to a greater or lesser extent, are vague and whose interpretation and application are questions of practice (see, for example, Kafkaris v.

xa0;          Z.K. 1990 grecque Athènes                     Nikolaos KANAKIDIS

time: There must be a sufficient causal connection between the conviction and the deprivation of liberty at issue (see Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295/99, § 64, ECHR 2002 ‑ IV; Kafkaris

consequences, but also to the “formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties” which may be attached to such conduct if it is found to be in breach of the national laws (see, mutatis mutandis , Kafkaris

;   In respect of the risk of an irreducible life sentence the High Court indicated that the combined effect of the decisions in Soering v. the United Kingdom (7 July 1989, Series A no. 161), Kafkaris

In short, there must be a sufficient causal connection between the conviction and the deprivation of liberty at issue (see Kafkaris v.

  It has been decided to issue a decision to discontinue the criminal proceedings ( Takipsizlik karari - non-prosecution decision ) under the provisions of Article 96 of the Criminal Code having regard

witnessed the events in question, the involvement of the family member in any attempts to obtain information and the way in which the authorities responded to those enquiries ( Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki

Kyösti Kaijanen Petri Kainulainen Pertti Kaivonen Juha Kakko Pertti Juhani Kallio Timo Johannes Kallio Arto Ahti Kalliojärvi Jouni Aatos Kalliomäki Pauli Olavi Kanerva Kimmo Kalle Kangas Ari Tapani Kankare

By decision of 18 March 2016 the Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun District Court of Yerevan granted the applicant’s complaint. On 5 May 2016 the Criminal Court of Appeal rejected the prosecution’s appeal.

imprisonment on an adult who has committed a particularly serious crime such as premeditated murder is not in itself prohibited by or incompatible with Article 3 or any other Article of the Convention (see Kafkaris

France , 18   December 1986, § 54, Series A no. 111, and Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, §   116, ECHR 2008). 40.

  53236/99, § 65, 10 December 2002; Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no.   21906/04, § 117, ECHR 2008 ‑ ...; M. v. Germany , cited above, § 88; and Haidn v.

foresee the consequences, but also to “formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties”, which may be attached to such conduct, if found to be in breach of the national laws (see, mutatis mutandis , Kafkaris

    The applicant was born in 1964 and lives in the village of Kalauri, Gurjaani District, Georgia. She was represented by Mr A. Merebashvili, a lawyer practising in Georgia. 3.

It also refers to the quality of the law, requiring it to be compatible with the rule of law, a concept inherent in all the Articles of the Convention (see, amongst other authorities, Kafkaris v.