Had these proceedings been unsuccessful, it would have been open to the applicants to have then lodged a complaint with this Court.

As regards the present case, the Greek authorities had already stated that the applicant would have had access to asylum proceedings once he returned to Greece.

The request of Dragica Markeš is inadmissible, as the conditions for initiating proceedings have not been met...

  They wished to have confirmed that they had been entitled to hotel accommodation during the period in question.   They did not claim any compensation, however.

According to the expert, the total annual rent which could have been obtained in 1974 was CYP 353 (approximately EUR 603).

Alexandrova and Mr   I.   Staikov, liquidators, acted on behalf of the company. It was represented before the Court by Mr   I. Todorov, Ms M. Kalaidjieva and Mr D.

    The appeal body must have authority to annul elections where irregularities may have affected the outcome.

  In respect of the other complaints raised by the applicant, the Court reiterated that they had been declared inadmissible and that it did not therefore have power to examine them.

In the case of Alexandrou v.

The applicants could and should have mentioned in their first asylum proceedings that they had held more important positions in the NDP than they had initially stated.

no criminal record, all have permanent residence, are well appreciated at work, have families and minor dependants.

    The Court first observes that the Government have not raised any arguments concerning the possibility, which appears to have been referred to in the case-law of the Court of Cassation, of

Subsequently, he divulged his real name and claimed to have been suspected by his former employer, a regional minister, of having been involved in a plot to kill the minister.

An application by the applicants to have the contract of sale set aside is still pending.

    Did the applicant have a fair trial in compliance with Article 6 §§   1 and 3 (c)-(d) of the Convention (compare Frumkin v. Russia , no.

Instead, the courts superior to those dealing with the merits of a case have such competence (Articles 27 and 28 of the Court's Act).

In September 2008 the newspaper and the ProRostov magazine published an article by the applicant entitled “What does the bitch have to do with it?” («А сука здесь причем?»)

xa0;         Application No. 28863/95                     by Aleksandra

In their opinion, however, the four trees in question could not have affected significantly the market value of the land (see paragraph 28 above). 69.