The applicants complained of the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in their favour and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.

The Russian authorities acknowledged the lengthy enforcement of the judgments in the applicant’s favour and proposed payment of 2,300 Euros.

, soit par l'intermédiaire de la SARL Mafi, dont il était le gérant de fait, la totalité du capital social de Master B ; que le gérant statutaire en était son propre frère, Roger X..., personnage si falot

    The applicants were claimants in civil proceedings concluded by judgments in their favour. 8.

    On 15 March 2003 the amount of RUB 292.20 was transferred to the applicant’s bank account pursuant to the judgment in her favour. 13.

    The Court notes that the judgment in favour of the applicant was fully enforced on 13 May 2004.

    NON-ENFORCEMENT OF THE JUDGMENT IN THE APPLICANT'S FAVOUR A.     Admissibility 12.

    It appears that the awards of 28 October 1999, 3 April 2001 and 24   April 2002 in the applicant’s favour have not been enforced to date. 2.

    The Court notes that the judgment in favour of the applicant was not enforced for nine months. The debtor in this case was a State body.

Victim Insufficient amount of non-pecuniary damage for non-enforcement of final judgment at domestic level: victim status upheld   Facts : In 1993, the applicants obtained a judgment in their favour

  1 about continued non-enforcement of the judgment in his favour. THE LAW By letter of 18   May 2006, the applicant informed the Court that he did not wish to pursue his application.

Between April and November 2010 the applicant lodged several claims seeking to have criminal proceedings instituted for non-enforcement of the judgment in his favour.

The applicant complained that there had been a breach of Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention on account of the non-enforcement of final court decision given in his favour which ordered the applicant

  The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of domestic judgment in her favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation

The applicant complained under Article 8 of the Convention about the manner in which the domestic courts had established contact rights in favour of her child’s grandparents.

    On 27 June 2014 the applicant’s representative informed the Court that the Albanian Government had enforced the final decision in favour of the applicant by paying him the salary arrears.

The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in her favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of

The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in his favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of

The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in her favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of