The applicant claims that due to this failure the legal aid defence counsel filed an appeal on the question of guilt which was rejected as formally inadmissible.

He explicitly argued in them that the judgment of 1 April 2021 had unequivocally established D.’s guilt for inflicting light bodily harm on him. He was legally represented in those proceedings.

The court relied on indirect evidence, mainly consisting of an extensive amount of witness statements, to establish the relevant circumstances of the case and to prove the applicant’s guilt.

Delacour, M'Hari, Derval pour la société Isère Fibre - Me Guellier, Me Chazaud, MM. Terlin et Godin pour le département de l'Isère.

Delacour, M'Hari, Derval pour la société Isère Fibre - Me Guellier, Me Chazaud, MM. Terlin et Godin pour le département de l'Isère.

Cyriaque A..., 2°/ Monsieur Cyriaque A..., demeurant à Le Guiler, commune de Lanrodec, Chatelaudren (Côtes du Nord), 3°/ Mademoiselle Corinne A..., demeurant Le Guiler, commune de Lanrodec, Chatelaudren

  On 28 November 1997 the Public Prosecutor attached to the Terni District Court requested that the applicant be remanded in custody on grounds that there was a serious indication of his guilt, the

In substantiation of the applicant’s guilt, the Regional Court relied, inter alia , on statements from S. and witnesses, and on material and forensic expert evidence.

et trois mémoires complémentaires enregistrés les1er avril, 29 septembre 2022, et 11 juillet 2023 sous le n° 2201659, l'association Accueil Petite Enfance Le Beau Soleil (APEBS), représentée par Me Guillois

representative of the State - not only the criminal court determining a criminal charge but also any other authorities of the State declare that a person is guilty of having committed an offence before that guilt

aimed at protecting society for an offence which the applicant had previously been convicted of, without there being new elements affecting the nature of the offence or the extent of the applicant’s guilt

had been established by the evidence – which was clearly not one for the determination of the police – but to the question whether the case file disclosed sufficient evidence of the applicant’s guilt

The issue of a person’s continued pre ‑ trial detention was distinct from the issue of his or her guilt: suspicions could not be thus equated with a formal finding of guilt.

Le ra ort de Mme Guidi, résidente, a été entendu au cours de l’audience ublique. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.

Le ra ort de Mme Guidi, résidente, a été entendu au cours de l’audience ublique. Considérant ce qui suit : M.

Le rapport de Mme Guidi, présidente, a été entendu au cours de l’audience publique. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.

Ont été entendus au cours de l’audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Guidi, - les conclusions de M. Denizot, rapporteur public, - et les observations de Me Hocquet-Berg, avocate de M.

Wallerich, président, - Mme Guidi, présidente-assesseure, - M. sibileau, premier conseiller. Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe, le 23 juillet 2024. La rapporteure, Signé : L.

Ont été entendus au cours de l’audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Guidi, - et les conclusions de M. Denizot, rapporteur public. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. Mme A...