Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2153049-2299718
25 octobre 2007
25 octobre 2007
It therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 3.
Source officiellePRESS;ADMISSIBILITYDECISIONS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-67977-3021997
18 juillet 2001
18 juillet 2001
The applicants – except for the first applicant, who was released on 5 May 2001 – are currently held in custody in the Transnistrian region.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68277-68745
30 mars 2000
30 mars 2000
The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time) of the European Convention on Human Rights and awarded
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2338636-2504126
14 avril 2008
14 avril 2008
It was very useful to make the legislature and judiciary aware of the Court’s existence and to show them that subsidiarity could help to reduce the actual or potential number of applications arriving in
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:003-451775-452566
20 novembre 2001
20 novembre 2001
Représentants des parties Gouvernement : Eva Jagander , agente , Cecilia Renfors , Johan Sangborn et Charlotte Hellner , conseillers ; Requérant :
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1367755-1427813
9 juin 2005
9 juin 2005
The court therefore held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 1.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2208848-2351128
14 décembre 2007
14 décembre 2007
The Court held by five votes to two that there had been no violation of Article 5 § 1 (right to liberty and security).
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0608JUD000006704
8 juin 2010
8 juin 2010
She was in need of all-embracing professional help in a secure environment for a long time. 21.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2320999-2499733
10 avril 2008
10 avril 2008
Finally, it held that the length of the disputed proceedings – six years and eight months – had been excessive, in violation of Article 6 § 1.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-671055-678211
17 décembre 2002
17 décembre 2002
Accordingly, the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 in that respect.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1902937-2006594
25 janvier 2007
25 janvier 2007
The Court held by four votes to three that there had been no violation of Article 5 § 3. (The judgment is available only in English.)
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1881591-1976061
19 décembre 2006
19 décembre 2006
The Court held unanimously in each case that there had been a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights; and that there had been a violation of Article
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1925439-2022411
22 février 2007
22 février 2007
The district court further held that it was not possible to establish whether Mr Krasulya himself had written the article but that he, as editor of the newspaper, was responsible for its publication.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1218121-1266477
14 décembre 2004
14 décembre 2004
Accordingly, the Court held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on that point.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68312-68780
18 juillet 2000
18 juillet 2000
Turkey, the European Court of Human Rights held by 6 votes to one that there had been a violation of Articles 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) and 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1371573-1431946
16 juin 2005
16 juin 2005
The conditions in which the applicant was held in remand prison IZ-21/2 in Tsivilsk were disputed among the parties.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1359752-1421309
2 juin 2005
2 juin 2005
The Court held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2207752-2362370
11 décembre 2007
11 décembre 2007
The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-665351-671873
10 décembre 2002
10 décembre 2002
The Court therefore held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 4.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1748331-1843614
22 août 2006
22 août 2006
The Commission held that the nationalisation of the applicants’ father’s villa had been illegal and awarded the applicants the villa and one of the plots of land.
Source officiellePage 34 sur 2440