of 2 x 1 cm on the left side of his neck, hyperaemia on his right shoulder blade and hyperaemia and abrasion of 1.5   cm on his left shin.

not been allowed to meet his wife during his detention on remand.

He directed his [subordinates] to render assistance [to the Russian police] in carrying out their search.

It added: “... the claimant’s accession to the throne of the Principality of Monaco did not deprive him of the right to respect for his private life, nor of his right to protection of his own image in

After his arrival there, he learned that his brother had been killed.

On 7 March 2002 the judge-rapporteur in his case turned down his request.

    In his complaint to the PPS of 26 July 2021 and in his subsequent repeated complaints (see paragraph 16 above), the applicant also argued that his not having his hand released and accordingly

He argued that that had resulted in the automatic and arbitrary continuation of his detention, in breach of his right to liberty and security. 4.

    The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the quashing of a final judgment in his favour.

The applicant considered this to be his case as, although he had served his sentence by 29 December 2016, he had subsequently remained in custody until 18 September 2018, that is to say until the Tartu

on remand, combined with the lack of a time-limit for the lower court to re-examine his detention, was found to render the applicant's detention arbitrary (see Khudoyorov , cited above, §§ 136-37). 81

  The Regional Court concluded that the applicant had still not substantiated his further claims.

Alexander Baglay said that his companion, Valodia Melianuk, had died but gave a date for his death which was shown to be inaccurate.

offences and the deficiencies in his character.

He was tied to a bar attached to the wall with his head facing down and beaten repeatedly. The officers knocked out seven of his teeth and broke two of his ribs.

It found that the applicant had no residence permit and that his stay in Austria was therefore unlawful. Thus, his removal from Austria was necessary in the public interest.

His arms are stretched out in front of him and his fingers rest on the wall to support all of his body weight. The detainee is not allowed to reposition his hands or feet. [8.]

the lawfulness of his detention shall be decided speedily by a court and his release ordered if the detention is not lawful.”

of his pre-trial detention.

    The applicant was his mother’s carer.