The applicant’s alleged ill-treatment on 28 June 2004 18.     The applicant’s account of events on 28 June 2004 is as follows.

    On 29 June 2006 the applicant was served with a copy of the detention order of 2 June 2006. He appealed against it on 30 June 2006. 14.

  June 2008); and the self-incriminating statements made during the official visit to the scene of the crime (record of 19 June 2008). 32 .

The District Court received the letter on 29 June 2011.

dealt with in the judgement of 5 June 2018.

The forensic report dated 23 June 2008 provides that the examination began on 15 June 2008 and ended on 20 June 2008 without specifying the exact date of the applicant’s examination by the forensic expert

Operation of 19 June 2013 15.     On 19 June 2013 the operation was carried out.

On 16 June 2013 the investigator conducted a search in the applicant’s office. According to the applicant, the search order was issued only on 17   June 2013.

Court, 24 June 2005, 14 June 2007 1,035 59 53628/08 MOSKALENKO SERGEY VLADIMIROVICH (unspecified) 25 October 2008 Krasnyy Luch Court, 15 June 2005 1,065 60 53634/08 UDOVENKO IVAN DMITRIYEVICH, 1928 25

La SCI JUNA et Monsieur [V] [M] ont saisi le juge de la mise en état d’un incident aux fins d’irrecevabilité.

uppercase } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } Resolution ResDH(2004)92 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 5 June

On 25 June 1983 the applicant’s lawyer asked that a formal investigation be opened. On 28 June 1983 the Public Prosecutor rejected this claim and the applicant appealed to the investigating judge.

On 22 June 2017 the prosecutor ordered a search of the applicant’s apartment, which had not been covered by the search warrants authorised by the judge on 8 June 2017.

    The incident of 15 June 2009 5.

Mais la société LAUREN VIDAL a contacté ces deux clients qui ont indiqué avoir reçu la visite de Madame Y... en tant que représentant des marques OLIVER JUNG et FASHION VIP.

The appeal of the applicant before the Audiencia Nacional was dismissed in a judgment of 19 June 2017 and so was his appeal for the annulment of the proceedings in a decision of 3 June 2018.

of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Skärby case delivered on 28 June

uppercase } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } Resolution ResDH(2006)62 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 18 June

margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Resolution ResDH(2002)75 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 27 June

The second applicant was placed in Plateias Dimokratias police station on three occasions between 30 th May 2013 and 3 rd June 2013, each time for more than three hours.