CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115531
26 novembre 2012
It also ordered that the applicant should be further kept in custody in the Kyiv SIZO.
Page 34 sur 277
ECLI:CEDH:001-113211
31 août 2012
Owing to a lack of penitentiary availability, the applicant was not put into prison and was kept at the anti-terrorism branch of the Diyarbakır Security Directorate for three days, during which he was
ECLI:CEDH:001-208744
19 février 2021
applicant’s case consistent with the essence of that offence and could it be reasonably foreseen (see, S.W. v. the United Kingdom , 22 November 1995, § 36, Series A no. 335 ‑ B; Streletz, Kessler
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0831DEC002186502
31 août 2006
no. 4210, which abolished the Erzincan State Security Court and established the Erzurum State Security Court, in 1997 the Erzurum State Security Court acquired jurisdiction over the case and the case-file
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1212JUD003585304
12 décembre 2006
Son père déclara quant à lui devant le tribunal que sa petite-fille était en Grèce avec sa fille, qui y résidait en qualité de réfugiée économique. 15.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009JUD000141307
9 octobre 2012
On 15 December 2010 the Supreme Administrative Court quashed the decision and held that the file should be returned to the Erzurum Administrative Court for reconsideration.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1021DEC003277606
21 octobre 2021
The Registry’s recent attempts to contact them by other means such as email addresses or phone numbers that were available in the files proved to be unsuccessful. THE LAW 4.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0217JUD002541110
17 février 2015
According to the information available in the case file, the litigation is still pending. THE LAW 8.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0404DEC005363820
4 avril 2024
droits de l’homme (cinquième section), siégeant le 4 avril 2024 en un comité composé de : Lado Chanturia , président , Carlo Ranzoni, María Elósegui , juges , et de Martina Keller
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0519DEC005082421
19 mai 2022
Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 19 May 2022 as a Committee composed of: Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström, President, Lətif Hüseynov, Kateřina Šimáčková, judges, and Martina Keller
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1215DEC004367615
15 décembre 2022
Fifth Section), sitting on 15 December 2022 as a Committee composed of: Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström , President , Mattias Guyomar, Kateřina Šimáčková , judges , and Martina Keller
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0422JUD004701810
22 avril 2014
The period to be taken into consideration began on 2 May 2002 and apparently has not yet ended, according to the information in the case file.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0217DEC005750714
Upon a thorough analysis of the case-file, the Court considers that the annulment of the title deed was the constitutive fact of the alleged interference.
ECLI:CEDH:001-167081
7 septembre 2016
Between 20 and 23 December 2011 the applicants were kept in police custody.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0413JUD006635714
13 avril 2017
File no. 184/14 was entirely classified and could not be disclosed at all. The applicant noted that the index showed that the classified documents in file no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0703DEC005623411
3 juillet 2018
Having received the file back, the Administrative Court requested an expert report from the Forensic Medicine Institute. 18.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0511DEC001789203
11 mai 2010
The CPT had visited Jelgavas prison, inter alia , where all life-sentenced prisoners had been kept at the relevant time. In its relevant part the report reads as follows: “83.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0110DEC001367003
10 janvier 2008
The file was assigned the number 56031.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0917REP002354194
17 septembre 1998
According to a file note of 12 August 1993, the Public Prosecutor's Office was not prepared to grant full access to the files as the records on the questioning of witness K. contained information
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1217JUD005193010
17 décembre 2013
Entre octobre et décembre 2007, le requérant ne put rencontrer son fils que trois fois. 14.